From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE19346832; Fri, 30 May 2025 18:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A355C400D7; Fri, 30 May 2025 18:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com (mail-pj1-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE63C40041 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 18:07:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-309fac646adso3170117a91.1 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1748621261; x=1749226061; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TjrbV9p70YCFX1vNxereCTN2xPQPN8hBaWSbW0UhmBw=; b=bEHGxgUZdXFKJ2Fo+fVJt83a7B63DSC5aV1lC2yNrdp5KeKmEPZMK2MMzN2zlOOg2h J++aEWHUl3vhRP7JLBwx5kqg1edxpzhn7UwzZy2gZQDIRlB3e6ausiuPOlisz1P2SXtg 6PGgiWte5kx8yx/TzjcuHHfOjW2IqtmxIW1HI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748621261; x=1749226061; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TjrbV9p70YCFX1vNxereCTN2xPQPN8hBaWSbW0UhmBw=; b=bzdNKZ3mqFuFIsgvFRmfpGIpt+Xyovdg6bwBBxmkf/7d/+F9Q66ZEe2clcErwzrI5J ZtmVUjZ55igON2L0U9drQmgU4K1f3xil1duHlPl14Ze2femEOHASXpNhSE15SO/3zHe3 /K32RykR8QXx9uMValCeqzP6WdCgKAqMoxQN6wom/N0KmXIeANkhLUwP0rHVOLPianpr mfoaCHECJGCZjdH2GADo1DsxdLig/I8uKdQrxECqrzMLyhONzuqB6Ox2idcanm7+elLH b+SbOs3XKKMkd7WrY7/UmNfSJdUa1HQGuQcXQCJNOql4uty2qUg3oRYMEfL0Nx7Sff3R lhEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yypel7xsBaFHAEKJpPdNz/GswX7qse51NHcpjXbkljWk/vkiqmP Egon+Rd1CxNGSOIIDJu75q+To5+QEE8kUwDh/mJWeyb8BaJh6Tx2s+ape4RWBAQpWI9xFP+Uow1 3ASqCr3U5er4/sdIvTFybk8V3VpYfLSfgblyn59Fozw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct1awpknGuGEAonfDJ9y860YUJEM/UpiCM3TUjDXAoxl9zN6il/a3NXht9WnBP yB7RisTLYPoVL4tiNdTKZNSdoEECpKJFi4BHSDh2R1O9zFLtPip+iSHMUkw8fMEU7GzDwgm2Va0 uP/EEomhtCdJcr4rE02pn00xYH3WkiwFrBCLXtN2sK5AAvERCCA6k/nIhLSODCLKvcWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGEr6PSvWPQVdBiAyDUxgwntnxd4H19uj0BCBx6UzIIjNYqH9wBlpm0NFMgQzOwHRJ63914vDEJjCVncZ4eQM4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:5487:b0:311:9cdf:a8a4 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-31245df03e9mr5980876a91.8.1748621260783; Fri, 30 May 2025 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 12:02:41 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFsdbf70Y937P2x0A3D9FBtdg2Z_yD1lOlEETdiZKrjywYeLrWPxsX6vi3U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Polling for patchseries in DPDK - the /series/ and /events/ endpoints To: Adam Hassick Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dev , Ali Alnubani , "Brandes, Shai" , zhoumin , "Puttaswamy, Rajesh T" , Aaron Conole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018969606365c9da6" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000018969606365c9da6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I went looking through recent series on patchwork and I think this is a good example of the timestamp condition: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/35145/. Looks like the original commits were made on April 18, then the newest version was submitted on May 5 but the series record retains the 4/18 date. And I see that there is no project filter provided by the /events/ endpoint. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/ Adam, would you agree the project filter for API requests is pretty low hanging fruit? Seems like a common sense improvement to me. On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:08=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb wro= te: > Thanks for the clarification regarding the datetimes. Yes let's clear up > any remaining questions offline at Prague. :) > --00000000000018969606365c9da6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I went looking through recent series on patchwork=C2=A0and= I think this is a good example of the timestamp condition:=C2=A0https://patchwork.dpdk.org/a= pi/series/35145/. Looks like the original commits were made on April 18= , then the newest version was submitted on May 5 but the series record reta= ins the 4/18 date.

And I see that there is no project fi= lter provided by the /events/ endpoint.=C2=A0https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/
<= br>
Adam, would you agree the project filter for API requests is = pretty low hanging fruit? Seems like a common sense improvement to me.

On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:08=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb = <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
= Thanks for the clarification regarding the datetimes. Yes let's clear u= p any remaining=C2=A0questions offline at Prague. :)
--00000000000018969606365c9da6--