From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB0DA09FF for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:05:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FD4140D4F; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:05:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD736140CF9; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:05:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id i18so17962017ioa.1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:05:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TFa4zp8Xl7gGH2Yx/KTeouJnVjC/2Uw4w/+5mTYB/2o=; b=HAdyQ74wtYJjZuFdqFXeXJXRWBraoWwkYgnbFaQFhjf41eUhSS4vhU64A0VB/4K/rJ QFmC2r3XEc0lA6aa9wvwDlaRN+sObRzH+v27weIajMF4EbyMp9/ElKR3AbxtxRCljp1O 6FP4NF0nt2FvwjR9elyUuR5oxPAfouCX+1jGsOWqVKaSztGCbbTnu9hOEnE3ZYJMBla1 Du+lh/jfuxK8HuFq9u8BbtvHbm4RZ7GDZcmGr8xLtTkHkXiw9rZKfOpksBrQVlc8UwI0 23kLpttEc6oQNfj34qfzBvWD37/f9jK+SiAKfYhcbmYzET+jVJSXPIr/OhbzcCscTl4i n0gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TFa4zp8Xl7gGH2Yx/KTeouJnVjC/2Uw4w/+5mTYB/2o=; b=mOKZtZlNoHcRjoExkmiqsiXEUJjSKoH1eW+orrOavrQ5Nj2tRyyHO7JUszLkHkqxgE xxmUhdBI/7zw9F19dM1Jb41fcv7muJokJpN3WQjVVbH7DKWdbAwgCaIbIxVgfUxJrEbo yitO6JLe67QoP0n5YMrlc+g++46sPgtnRmK4HP4IsHbRqIZTyFgyTdVxNhELpXv5tJy3 ZddU0QTXvZ1KL789DFjAbRKoNImdaQiE4d1FsfKOAfdCZTX3sWV9as1Re9IBtF2FfxL9 cmQV+rsD4TZUc7bAelCcxJyL83/SMZLxdenUApDB7R73oEbzTHBihhk5bCpetCGWI070 l9Vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EnbySKNsqWGokj0eUQTLiPzB0ogJJOY0Wt+sfSHjbe3IP7PNU Nf2SBs8GHNx10tq3S9U7i/jsmT0fE2UoPBLWsuQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2Qi9/3rIqSgYgvVVEqHH/aJspe1TcOYGwC8IGzKatzUZNVtU0QeMhaJqNY5ho0u3d6jHVNh+bksNQHzRySoc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:93:: with SMTP id h19mr14635773iob.59.1610373900162; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:05:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:34:44 +0530 Message-ID: To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: David Marchand , dpdklab , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000465d5705b8a06461" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000465d5705b8a06461 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:28 PM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > Hi All, > > How do you want us to handle this in the lab? Can we pull / disable this > unit test from the arm system, ignore it from now (if it's going to be > fixed), disable the unit tests on arm for now (while it's being fixed)? > Maybe it is better to have a "known issue" based skip mechanism to address this in CI. > > Cheers, > LIncoln > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey guys, >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand >> > wrote: >> > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: >> > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ >> > > >> > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets >> > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets >> > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets >> > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets >> > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done >> > > === testing big burst (burst) === >> > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 >> > > Test Failed >> > > RTE>> >> > > --- stderr --- >> > >> > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this >> > unit test for ARM. >> > Did it ever work? >> >> No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor >> library. >> Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as >> low priority. >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > David Marchand >> > >> > > > -- > *Lincoln Lavoie* > Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > lylavoie@iol.unh.edu > https://www.iol.unh.edu > +1-603-674-2755 (m) > > --000000000000465d5705b8a06461 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




Maybe it is better to have=C2= =A0a "known issue" based skip mechanism to address this in CI.

=C2=A0

Cheers,
LIncoln

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand <david.ma= rchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand
> <dav= id.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor te= st:
> > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashbo= ard/patchsets/15077/
> >
> > Worker 59 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 60 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 61 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 62 handled 0 packets
> > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
> > =3D=3D=3D testing big burst (burst) =3D=3D=3D
> > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783
> > Test Failed
> > RTE>>
> > --- stderr ---
>
> Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this
> unit test for ARM.
> Did it ever work?

No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor library= .
Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as
low priority.



>
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>


--
Lincoln Lavoie
Senior Engineer, Broadband Tec= hnologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.ed= u
+1-603-674-2755 (m)

--000000000000465d5705b8a06461--