From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C779A2BF3 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:10:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id r203so56285005oih.0 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=atomicrules-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gRwXPqvY5HL9HufCdEc3S9RpXoMiSGaONrA0u9E93LE=; b=W2E6zhGAuXjg9j/yVvowcIOjW7qSfpL8+J/uK13ksYwBNt3u9QiZ3GptBBr0TV2UZb Av0j66OXc6RAdXeGg+/wQ1VGYsXuE9xDEwbvOT3o9zehUXhiaiFKVufNDc5l/JSm/Y9Z iHXA/wiILQ6mdNqOhJ4DNM6BrhU1Q6Strv781b3mHUBTOodLvHR65Kxmu/ydbwK/bDre Km9OrO6XvfSHtCbdiCqtnU5rGguylrCuMlytCUXu8jIK4iagSTIBvpMMV6hfKEfOotF6 4SYhe0jfqTUVMPpVh6Y+o/QKJWXG05ZqelPy6lNR0vLAeb2hHoA+VI2QUtBA4tST6tVI XqfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gRwXPqvY5HL9HufCdEc3S9RpXoMiSGaONrA0u9E93LE=; b=SERNyEgOceXHpdW1HZYlEe6iMxMJHvlQBWoy4iyGjWcq9Fsfv9CJqpR2JKlShE8BMM eRa70ay13WECwiYDkiW0qItflH5MXL2u44V0D8Y9VKiXuAYbFdSwzjdHDrS8ZdbS9Btu wxhIKu5vWn1Y3nGFRw7/OeSnukJerG5F5/mnUTUJVgtj5Fjb9kvSj3XQRQdc3B4HrxGD jFLcnClNxsKn28O3PHZ4vAN0LgvykhLAWrWUGOOPDYTmztLxraaqLX+oAqIQFModeyAQ knxA69b513Z8F/t/Sq2cjZREOXLkNwhd56yN/2MA6X3usMJQ7UZRu50HctBv4/spXZe9 FmCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h+pmGhzt3nZGH4DuPQS7FpLEArI+gK/ZJ/GdCT7La2v3EqQ9YL ytGGOcW/Zu6f43tXyIWsyBTxQHHWDbJG X-Received: by 10.202.186.10 with SMTP id k10mr2039077oif.100.1504113001931; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.150.178 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAA404774D@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Shepard Siegel Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:10:01 -0400 Message-ID: To: Trishan de Lanerolle Cc: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Erez Scop , "Mcnamara, John" , Patrick MacArthur , ci@dpdk.org, Shreyansh Jain , Bob Noseworthy , "Xu, Qian Q" , Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ce1682ed8780557fb99be" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Minutes of DPDK Lab Meeting, August 22nd X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:10:03 -0000 --001a113ce1682ed8780557fb99be Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Trishan, Thank you for that reminder. We have reviewed the UNH Agreement and currently have no redline feedback from our attorney. If you don't hear from us by the end of this week; that's an implicit accept for Atomic Rules. best, Shep Shepard Siegel, CTO atomicrules.com On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Trishan de Lanerolle < tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hi, > As we work to move the paperwork forward, have you had an opportunity to > connect with your legal teams to review the documents. > > The usage agreement in particular is directly applicable to members > contributing hardware. > > Please let me know your feedback/red line changes by end of the week if > possible. > > Thanks, > Trishan > > > > On Aug 22, 2017 5:07 PM, "O'Driscoll, Tim" > wrote: > > Distribution list: > - We agreed to use the ci@dpdk.org mailing list for any future discussion > on the lab, so I've used it for these minutes. I've copied those who were > on the previous distribution for the minutes, in case anybody has not yet > subscribed to ci@dpdk.org. If you haven't subscribed yet, you can do so > at: http://dpdk.org/ml. > > Lab Contract: > - The draft contract, with changes based on the LF review, is attached. > Others should review this and return comments to Bob (ren@iol.unh.edu) by > Friday > September 1st. We'll discuss any significant issues at our next meeting on > September 5th. > - The UNH-IOL Usage Agreement is also attached, and is also available at: > https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/charters/unh-iol > -usage-agreement.pdf. People may want to review this as well. > > Hardware: > - NXP and Intel hardware is in procurement. Mellanox hardware is ready but > needs internal approval before shipping to UNH. > > CI: > - The script Mellanox have been working on to identify the target > repository for a patch set is being reviewed internally and should be sent > to the mailing list soon. > - Fangfang has sent a patch that includes a reference doc and some other > scripts. Thomas will review this. > > Test Results: > - Discussed whether we always need to provide absolute numbers for test > results, or if delta values can be provided in some cases. Providing delta > values may be useful for new hardware or new tests that have not yet been > fully tuned, where vendors do not want to make absolute numbers public. > - Agreed that we should be able to decide per vendor and per test case > whether absolute or delta numbers should be provided. This should be > configured as part of the test script, so that the result is either the > absolute performance number or a delta comparing this to a previous > reference value. > > Future meetings: > - Agreed to continue these meetings on a bi-weekly basis for now. If > anybody else on this mailing list wants to join, let me know and I'll > forward the meeting details. > > > > --001a113ce1682ed8780557fb99be Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Trishan,

Thank you for th= at reminder. We have reviewed the UNH Agreement and currently have no redli= ne feedback from our attorney. If you don't hear from us by the end of = this week; that's an implicit accept for Atomic Rules.

bes= t, Shep

Shepard Siegel, CTO
atomicrules.com


<= br>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Trishan de L= anerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org> w= rote:
Hi,
As we work to move the paperwork forward, have you had an opportunity t= o connect with your legal teams to review the documents.=C2=A0

The usage agreement in particular is= directly applicable to members contributing hardware.=C2=A0

Please let me know your feedback/red = line changes by end of the week if possible.=C2=A0
<= br>
Thanks,
Trishan



On Aug 22, 2017 5:07 PM, &qu= ot;O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com> wrote:
Distribution list:
- We agreed to use the ci@= dpdk.org mailing list for any future discussion on the lab, so I've= used it for these minutes. I've copied those who were on the previous = distribution for the minutes, in case anybody has not yet subscribed to ci@dpdk.org. If you haven= 't subscribed yet, you can do so at: http://dpdk.org/ml.

Lab Contract:
- The draft contract, with changes based on the LF review, is attached. Oth= ers should review this and return comments to Bob (ren@iol.unh.edu) by Friday
September 1st. We'll discuss any significant issues at our next meeting= on September 5th.
- The UNH-IOL Usage Agreement is also attached, and is also available at: <= a href=3D"https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/charters/unh-iol-usag= e-agreement.pdf" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.iol.unh.e= du/sites/default/files/charters/unh-iol-usage-agreement.pdf. = People may want to review this as well.

Hardware:
- NXP and Intel hardware is in procurement. Mellanox hardware is ready but = needs internal approval before shipping to UNH.

CI:
- The script Mellanox have been working on to identify the target repositor= y for a patch set is being reviewed internally and should be sent to the ma= iling list soon.
- Fangfang has sent a patch that includes a reference doc and some other sc= ripts. Thomas will review this.

Test Results:
- Discussed whether we always need to provide absolute numbers for test res= ults, or if delta values can be provided in some cases. Providing delta val= ues may be useful for new hardware or new tests that have not yet been full= y tuned, where vendors do not want to make absolute numbers public.
- Agreed that we should be able to decide per vendor and per test case whet= her absolute or delta numbers should be provided. This should be configured= as part of the test script, so that the result is either the absolute perf= ormance number or a delta comparing this to a previous reference value.

Future meetings:
- Agreed to continue these meetings on a bi-weekly basis for now. If anybod= y else on this mailing list wants to join, let me know and I'll forward= the meeting details.




--001a113ce1682ed8780557fb99be--