DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:27:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOE1vsMJ5CX7dn9CY5ESAFMeV15zRLCvmJ6XkwjSvFXRzaRC8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1692874.CEL9UuTRB0@thomas>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]

This is specific to patches for DTS, where Intel doesn't have the
infrastructure to run every possible test suite that is included in DTS.
So, the warning is a notice to the submitter and the maintainer(s) the
patch couldn't be tested. It's not really an issue related to the content
of the patch itself (i.e. not about a breaking change or something like
that).

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:05 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
wrote:

> 26/08/2021 15:33, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > * For DTS CI, should authors be notified of skipped testing (i.e. CI
> infrastructure doesn’t support that test suite)?  Should this be marked as
> a warning in patchwork?  Agreed it should do both of these actions, notify
> the author and mark the patch as warning in patchworks.
>
> Not sure to understand.
> If a test is not supported, it is not an issue of the patch,
> so why would it be reported in patchwork?
>
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2287 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-26 13:33 Lincoln Lavoie
2021-08-26 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-26 16:27   ` Lincoln Lavoie [this message]
2021-08-31 15:47     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-01 12:49       ` Owen Hilyard
2021-09-07  9:23         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-07  8:36 ` David Marchand
2021-09-07 12:31   ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-15 19:48 [dpdk-ci] " Lincoln Lavoie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOE1vsMJ5CX7dn9CY5ESAFMeV15zRLCvmJ6XkwjSvFXRzaRC8g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).