From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45306A04DC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F4BAA25; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:37:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (mail-ej1-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DB5AA15 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z5so3388124ejw.7 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:37:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=slSq+vzZaA+DZmyBTg3nZXuLW3w8k+nf2wTqKENNh88=; b=aJ2T2t/4CamM+BsMGZ9WAGT6Ug0kI1eOCQd8yXrsoqZfbtex3/4s6n4rPYrR5Z2gBg TwxByKS3fpUSLLe4Vk2Y9j0s2dikNv45veh412r1ifYt+BJ4Mj51PZjTdylcFstOyFd/ zvLa5vgxJf7Jbq13NynNM4mtunADJ6AKrSWSg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=slSq+vzZaA+DZmyBTg3nZXuLW3w8k+nf2wTqKENNh88=; b=XvLOepzv5oJNUJ8BdQpwxzVzcjS9gqBrlOif/wAChpuzQAlUuYVOYlodXPgtnAC0aC bNxwuGajSibzznpyS4QjgQK9lOoiHtoaSHdyrV20Wp0mTRwraDM5MgHdYFQoo1TVuxGb sP+T+7wrs/JB+031jv29tV9zsI7uYZPulUvZJDjB6wHjA2eH5rZEhyxYV5MW1Fr2LIcf oRwPU87X4h7almYT63m0I4WYjFI/35hz9w7Vb60zxJhiEhRDowhyUXUh8gPXqduh3GzH NOWL2P9ugnFEt3JsQLBsAxoCTMAnt3UKOq44Yo5/IHZfOws+FHdpxxoE/fhPZf7H0kQX bMWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FiOLKVFwO14D01+g5jnHrXYsxLaWq+ysGcz+9AyWraRiA39l0 Ki2duAbqPipMqkHR6gMvlfgz7Rhb6MGk78IekFy+TQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVqCpDH4zKk1WDUvhIktJEKJoHJutyg8ISsnYJJOP2Zg1KcCSLjZyv5WJZjO3SnDKSCaWSccscO6yUYpx+F8g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d159:: with SMTP id br25mr3960930ejb.155.1603208224327; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <320640640.vBkTyhWo6Z@thomas> <5dd38122ad604199bd0a484846f06f55@intel.com> <48856990f7164709ba958d81e0f9187e@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:35:48 -0400 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo Cc: "Tu, Lijuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , Thomas Monjalon , "ci@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b65bad05b21c00a4" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000b65bad05b21c00a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the patch I was talking about, where we might now be missing a requirement on those systems: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-October/000815.html Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Brandon Lo wrote: > Hi Lijuan, > > Yes, we have "build_type=3Dmeson" in the execution.cfg file. > > DTS compiles DPDK using these commands: > "CC=3Dgcc meson --werror -Denable_kmods=3DTrue -Dlibdir=3Dlib > --default-library=3Dstatic x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc" > and > "ninja -C x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc -j 62" > > Running functional tests, we get: > "x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd: No such file or directory" > > Thanks, > Brandon > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Tu, Lijuan wrote: > >> I mean config =E2=80=9Cbuild_type=3Dmeson=E2=80=9D in DTS/execution.cfg,= Snice DPDK don=E2=80=99t >> support =E2=80=9Cmake=E2=80=9D now, we have to use meson build. >> >> >> >> *From:* ci *On Behalf Of *Tu, Lijuan >> *Sent:* 2020=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8820=E6=97=A5 21:40 >> *To:* Brandon Lo ; Lincoln Lavoie ; >> Chen, Zhaoyan >> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon ; ci@dpdk.org >> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK >> >> >> >> Did you use meson build ? >> >> >> >> *From:* Brandon Lo >> *Sent:* 2020=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8820=E6=97=A5 21:19 >> *To:* Lincoln Lavoie ; Tu, Lijuan < >> lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan >> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon ; ci@dpdk.org >> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK >> >> >> >> I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers. >> DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that >> testpmd is in the build's output directory. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brandon >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie >> wrote: >> >> Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to >> testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Lincoln >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon >> wrote: >> >> 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK? >> > >> > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile >> > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is >> > not building testpmd. >> > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS. >> >> No testpmd should be built. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Lincoln Lavoie* >> >> Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies >> >> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 >> >> lylavoie@iol.unh.edu >> >> https://www.iol.unh.edu >> >> +1-603-674-2755 (m) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Brandon Lo >> >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory >> >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 >> >> blo@iol.unh.edu >> >> www.iol.unh.edu >> > > > -- > > Brandon Lo > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > > blo@iol.unh.edu > > www.iol.unh.edu > --=20 *Lincoln Lavoie* Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --000000000000b65bad05b21c00a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thi= s is the patch I was talking about, where we might now be missing a require= ment on those systems:=C2=A0https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-October/00= 0815.html
<= br>
Cheers,
= Lincoln

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
Hi Lijuan,

Yes, we have "build_type=3Dmeson" in the execution.cfg fil= e.

DTS compiles DPDK using these commands:
"CC=3Dgcc meson --werror -Denable_kmods=3DTrue -Dlibdir=3Dlib --def= ault-library=3Dstatic x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc"
and
"ninja -C x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc -j 62"

Running functional tests, we get:
"x86_64-na= tive-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd: No such file or directory"

Thanks,
Brandon

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020= at 9:53 AM Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com> wrote:

I mean config =E2=80=9Cbuild_type=3Dmeson=E2=80=9D i= n DTS/execution.cfg, Snice DPDK don=E2=80=99t support =E2=80=9Cmake=E2=80= =9D now, we have to use meson build.

=C2=A0

From: ci <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Tu= , Lijuan
Sent: 2020=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8820= =E6=97=A5 21:40
To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Chen, Zhaoyan = <zhaoyan.che= n@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK

=C2=A0

Did you use meson build ?

=C2=A0

From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: 2020=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8820= =E6=97=A5 21:19
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Chen, = Zhaoyan <zha= oyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK

=C2=A0

I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintai= ners.
DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd,=C2=A0and it assumes tha= t testpmd is in the build's output directory.

=C2=A0

Thanks,

Brandon

=C2=A0

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie <<= a href=3D"mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target=3D"_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.e= du> wrote:

Is this because of th= e change that adds some python requirements to testpmd? I remember seeing s= omething about that go by on the lists.

=C2=A0<= /span>

Cheers,
Lincoln

=C2=A0

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon <= thomas@monjalon.ne= t> wrote:

20/10/2020 14:31, Brand= on Lo:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK?
>
> Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is > not building testpmd.
> We are also using the latest commit available for DTS.

No testpmd should be built.


=C2=A0

--

Lincoln Lavoie

Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies

21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824=

+1-603-674-2755 (m)


=C2=A0

--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory=

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 0382= 4

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu



--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laborator= y

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu



--
Lincoln Lavoie
Seni= or Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Dur= ham, NH 03824
+1-603-674-2755 = (m)

<= /div>
--000000000000b65bad05b21c00a4--