On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:53 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 11/3/21 09:38, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On 11/3/21 09:36, David Marchand wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo > wrote: > >>> Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses > >>> this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it > >>> adapts to DPDK 21.11 > >> > >> Please, no. > >> We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". > >> > >> The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. > >> You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. > >> Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 > >> > >> Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. > >> > >> > >> In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle > >> this change. > >> Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build > >> tested again in CI. > > > > Thanks for the insights, I'll file a Bz and work with the SPDK team. > > The Bz has been filed: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=876 > > > Maxime > >> Thanks. > >> > >> > > SDPK tests have been disabled in the CI testing and shouldn't run for any new patches. Anything that was already in the queue will finish out. Bug ticket has been updated. Who from the SPDK team "has the ball" on this item, so we know it's being tracked and worked on? Cheers, Lincoln -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)