From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1CA0C53 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:12:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8B24115A; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:12:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955F441149 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:12:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id v11so6441923edc.9 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cKoCMkEkqaULMGriMjGdVnc5uH7QZmRum3Hz8SATwfY=; b=c9GuKmPyRiU4czhoMrtAI+0piPuNLoSnrNQfH/2dgFQ0Nizbmz7M3DMP3Iv1P8X7R2 GGd+kpKQntDGI5jHU4tU7Hu9+XagFOxxQP0JO8WRJWV6JwLc7RcLCo5rjDUV9PEaG2SM 189/qsHZ0wbmiMY++v+iY63LgIqxgfhelhvAw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cKoCMkEkqaULMGriMjGdVnc5uH7QZmRum3Hz8SATwfY=; b=2bg1ofsrgSdCK1UU23XOv7kN//fe6JZUTmPtM3DSKAAOwaZTucDHnmWVEKcPg/rRjT axTk9859c2Y6pjewQuNJx2pM1H3IMtsBJPZejd2OJy7inGhZeRzqvlFmCvMKJ/i9gqAJ kQxWGXyA9TtjMJx8dAxvosaG3bwXGmvYJpWVCua5pBDgEUQ9aL7dx90Xp1TgUcpsIIgd 2tJPqd9NYJUAOmU4d3oTIEQS46uDE/eOhZc6iLbver7zzz/OsoegjG/MNE2rRZu2Plip uWx9IGN2jZvKqIZZ1LQOVmLDs7BT5cAVNZ7jzZcZ22P53Ow8uU0LfeHSOIvsM39PRk3w QjjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jpENGuCZr+3VhabgLcdJPtRPMer9eUp+gLuUOhGhbZs4dj/kp yvT9qyjM4tUgQhGxuJoRlkq5AY9xukWOGvPTVXlM8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLkbL+nwN2SKTeDvW0RCvBYP01zlt6QcjyN7Hb/vFW0TM/ntQCEty5hZ5a+XBgC3Y9kUcih3adGotKCLPzGLg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4788:: with SMTP id cw8mr54647177ejc.97.1635945131070; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211102104748.57078-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <3a63bda9-2ff7-30bc-87b7-48e1324d1666@redhat.com> <242aa665-45b6-2441-4288-26a4056dc3e2@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <242aa665-45b6-2441-4288-26a4056dc3e2@redhat.com> From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:11:57 -0400 Message-ID: To: Maxime Coquelin Cc: David Marchand , "Xia, Chenbo" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Changpeng" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Owen Hilyard Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000068f34705cfe2281e" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --00000000000068f34705cfe2281e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:53 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 11/3/21 09:38, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On 11/3/21 09:36, David Marchand wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo > wrote: > >>> Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses > >>> this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it > >>> adapts to DPDK 21.11 > >> > >> Please, no. > >> We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". > >> > >> The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. > >> You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. > >> Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 > >> > >> Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. > >> > >> > >> In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle > >> this change. > >> Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build > >> tested again in CI. > > > > Thanks for the insights, I'll file a Bz and work with the SPDK team. > > The Bz has been filed: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=876 > > > Maxime > >> Thanks. > >> > >> > > SDPK tests have been disabled in the CI testing and shouldn't run for any new patches. Anything that was already in the queue will finish out. Bug ticket has been updated. Who from the SPDK team "has the ball" on this item, so we know it's being tracked and worked on? Cheers, Lincoln -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --00000000000068f34705cfe2281e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:53 AM Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> w= rote:


On 11/3/21 09:38, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 11/3/21 09:36, David Marchand wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com> wrote:<= br> >>> Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses<= br> >>> this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when i= t
>>> adapts to DPDK 21.11
>>
>> Please, no.
>> We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI".
>>
>> The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first.
>> You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab.
>> Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id= =3D579
>>
>> Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK.
>>
>>
>> In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to hand= le
>> this change.
>> Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK bui= ld
>> tested again in CI.
>
> Thanks for the insights, I'll file a Bz and work with the SPDK tea= m.

The Bz has been filed:
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D876

> Maxime
>> Thanks.
>>
>>

SDPK tests have been disabled in the CI testing and shouldn't run fo= r any new patches.=C2=A0 Anything that was already in the queue will finish= out.=C2=A0 Bug ticket has been updated.

Who from the SPDK team "has = the ball" on this item, so we know it's being tracked and worked o= n?

Cheers,
Lincoln


-= -
Lincoln Lavoie=
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 = Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
https://www.iol.unh.edu<= /div>
+1-603-674-2755 (m)

--00000000000068f34705cfe2281e--