From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB5CA0032 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:46:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7192140141; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:46:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C7240040 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:46:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id w1so22002538edc.6 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:46:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oczmq2jiPmC6xWFfc3a5AUlSCvQqjAsO0hngAGgNh+Q=; b=LREDz6zqyKoTijeUKl405T309xm1H3UqBBaDbNfp0Iy9t+yY2g7sEkdNxEr7BUW0md 42K+dMDE98W6hM8HESpo7c6q0ERKCWrSkfAd23m28YMiCvNc0kRIbO0ZiaP9bb4tWUbR JND98Qy4tfQC68JyGqNHTSv30hCGrZRHQh+Vk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oczmq2jiPmC6xWFfc3a5AUlSCvQqjAsO0hngAGgNh+Q=; b=eMs/hrQPMsbsD1gzKjOfTwyRNTLidsrknnUd4jGdKej5wd9EdwBDfFLTYhgY4VAtBo dXI2A1jacWrPwnk096BV8keZodPiJgZrVASQvqiYDriv7eoECY12jgQXN8KrrGBZ3Zuz /+gNPBLaDKQth9dHGwJ3H+JBIXp+YkV9Gfijm1SZyGfn1EPRx4Yw1DTKTh7e4d3qkz6l Wfhlw0QXT80ralDjGPfnAWeUELcQO+/Sd8aDuwhTgLizAWb0M6hBOGUZH0+10g5i3fTP sljVAg4SN/nPwfds7AnMr7jZT3ST1ZSscU3qYJ+bLuctcOJ3SAaIdEuiFLUKM4UAlp4F ToiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325U/RhpwLtzLAwtbsBe7Z0v2GXYGhgSqBjRnw+vylLU+KCMEhY vNwAGoLXkbrnIgYqw3jwtalNf5A6+3b9CS9KLlS15wMIQRgO+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxrk9YpNA0jbfsNNpSRcaWIlTlHWXsRoAazFCUy0j9U/zKBej6O8jYJJ1I7yfTXnbYTTGGz3lG+a7TL13WWoU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e16:: with SMTP id sd22mr9688742ejc.542.1637070416775; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:46:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1756614.3rAJA5Eeto@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1756614.3rAJA5Eeto@thomas> From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:46:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: spell check To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Thomas, This has been disabled in the lab. I think it should be possible to get to a base state where there aren't errors, it just requires getting past all of the acronyms and other "strange" (to a spell checker's prospective) parts of the documentation, like function names / prototypes, etc. Part of the idea behind putting the spell checker scripts, and more importantly the dictionary and exceptions, into the devtools would be to allow the community to manage that list of exceptions, etc. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:54 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > After some thoughts, I think it is not reasonable to check spelling > in the CI, because we will always have false positives. > > Please could we disable "ci/iol-spell-check-testing" to avoid warnings? > > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)