Re: [dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551

[Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2272 bytes --]

Hi David,

Did you get any response to this from the Intel folks?  Should we add a bug
to track this for discussion / review at our meeting next week?

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:07 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> (It looks like I have no luck with CI those days... :-)).
>
> All patches of a series of mine
> (https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=10551) are
> marked as failing all compilation in Intel CI.
>
> - Is it normal to see all patches with the exact same test report?
> Patch 1: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137872.html
> Patch 9: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html
>
> UNH and ovsrobot only report once when testing a full series.
> It makes more sense if Intel CI only tests full series.
>
>
> - Putting the first point aside, and focusing on patch 9 error:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html
>
> ../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c: In function
> ‘bucket_get_count’:
> ../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c:400:2: error: implicit
> declaration of function ‘rte_lcore_iterate’; did you mean
> ‘rte_lcore_is_enabled’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   rte_lcore_iterate(count_per_lcore, &ctx);
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   rte_lcore_is_enabled
> ../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c:400:2: error: nested
> extern declaration of ‘rte_lcore_iterate’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
>
> This function is defined in rte_lcore.h which does seem to be
> included, seeing how the compiler suggests another
> rte_lcore_is_enabled function.
> The v2 revision passed fine
> (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137552.html) and
> I see no change in v3 that would break like this.
>
> I am a bit puzzled...
> One thing that comes to mind, do we have dpdk headers installed
> system-wide on the Intel CI server(s)?
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu/>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4083 bytes --]