DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
To: ci@dpdk.org
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: UNH CI is offline
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:59:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOE1vsODAe=MeQFcHy2KLwPhcdgPGLLyEAzfP++U7LOgVwGonQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3355501.KgjxqYA5nG@thomas>

Hello All,

Just a quick follow up. Jenkins upgrades have been completed and the system
is getting caught up to the patches that have come in. Please let us know
if you would like any patches rerun.  We'll also take a pass through the
history this week to look for anything that needs to be rerun as well.

Next for upgrades will be the dashboard system and our vpn / router.  The
dashboard will not impact running just, just browsing results. The vpn /
router upgrade will require us to stop the existing jobs.  We expect both
of these to be completed this week.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:01 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 09/12/2021 15:33, Aaron Conole:
> > Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> writes:
> > > That does raise a question on storage of historical results (i.e. the
> > > results tar balls) and how long we need to keep those available. The
> > > results (i.e. pass / fail indication) would live on in the dashboard
> and
> > > database, but the actual results archives (tar balls) are stored in
> Jenkins
> > > as a job.  Would limiting that storage to 4 or 6 months be acceptable
> to
> > > the community?  This will reduce the future issues of upgrades and
> > > migration, in terms of processing time required by Jenkins. A test
> could
> > > always be rerun, if we needed to recreate an older set of logs/results.
> > > I'll add this as a discussion item for the next community call.
> >
> > +1 - thanks.
>
> I think we don't need more history than current and previous releases.
> So I bet 8 months is a fair amount of test history.
>
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-06 18:19 Lincoln Lavoie
2021-12-08 22:09 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2021-12-09 14:33   ` Aaron Conole
2021-12-09 16:01     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-12-13 19:59       ` Lincoln Lavoie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOE1vsODAe=MeQFcHy2KLwPhcdgPGLLyEAzfP++U7LOgVwGonQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).