From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B047A09FF for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F69140CDE; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com (mail-ej1-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A03140CC1 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ce23so24842547ejb.8 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:58:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8TcLvEagOL/kRxK1H230EB4CF2TB+g9B4Bvkk5+wCc0=; b=YUZPXyMj+EqRUZdDdWKPmdjOGE6DZL/FDKSWnCEBPlCLZ/3kgubTeqEP8nbG0n9s3F QBzF36grMrXBmgBG9TbDcIhO1NijCUKTdu/yqeCKQKaV2AIatBs4De9BBT+7Up7/Yvs3 k5uE+WY8xBaj4/4xbW+njRLfDWRWV9ylwepbY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8TcLvEagOL/kRxK1H230EB4CF2TB+g9B4Bvkk5+wCc0=; b=dH/rEu/whfT8dM4D+Ire6oflBahiPxe+/JJ5ich1IN2FCoHS3ZMwfZsCeMmeTgk4hF bOOC1yyQnA4kiQjZ+mTa0OtaIFE7SJN/RBf//SbWWOAOIDxud0oj5vH8fNu6LbVHeuTi hWbKuaLTzoraSf98h9lRiiTLgp1tybhvzbzbSJ7zQefzytCLGjLg+Tu9DNMzluhM6mmT wForH2dHqPurLd8nFiem+hsNdMzJc3L5NOkJjGRRcKNnvDXQXxTf6YKLCR/BJZv4PJec AL9vrc2/82xDg4tH6cttxZoKlxfCMqAAfRPXxgcYRc89KekqoQSWf4NLJ3ScLJqivUY0 O0hA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D/pn0RgKqVuzFVoiOG/1YKaztA2cIJ3B9eJ/GltKuv5ZaQ9Jw ASbxrsCmv5lXeDSoLXRoiEYorbnVflJeQYwvSrZJyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvO9Yymto4HIeliaineb9Aoy1myZe7okBNMjvCOHiLWuL7p8tyhgkrOHbVGguK+0TlZJHtkWy4/3KuntSVY34= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:578e:: with SMTP id k14mr11015956ejq.90.1610373501250; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:58:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:56:20 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Cc: David Marchand , dpdklab , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f8ccf05b8a04c8c" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --0000000000007f8ccf05b8a04c8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, How do you want us to handle this in the lab? Can we pull / disable this unit test from the arm system, ignore it from now (if it's going to be fixed), disable the unit tests on arm for now (while it's being fixed)? Cheers, LIncoln On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand > wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand > > wrote: > > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ > > > > > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets > > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done > > > === testing big burst (burst) === > > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 > > > Test Failed > > > RTE>> > > > --- stderr --- > > > > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this > > unit test for ARM. > > Did it ever work? > > No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor > library. > Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as > low priority. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Marchand > > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --0000000000007f8ccf05b8a04c8c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi = All,

=
How do you want us t= o handle this in the lab?=C2=A0 Can we pull / disable this unit test from t= he arm system, ignore it from now (if it's going to be fixed), disable = the unit tests on arm for now (while it's being fixed)?

Cheers,
LIncoln

On Mon, Jan 11, = 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob <je= rinjacobk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand
<david.ma= rchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand
> <dav= id.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor te= st:
> > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashbo= ard/patchsets/15077/
> >
> > Worker 59 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 60 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 61 handled 0 packets
> > Worker 62 handled 0 packets
> > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
> > =3D=3D=3D testing big burst (burst) =3D=3D=3D
> > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783
> > Test Failed
> > RTE>>
> > --- stderr ---
>
> Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this
> unit test for ARM.
> Did it ever work?

No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor library= .
Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as
low priority.



>
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>


--
Lincoln Lavoie
Seni= or Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Dur= ham, NH 03824
+1-603-674-2755 = (m)

<= /div>
--0000000000007f8ccf05b8a04c8c--