From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA69A0351 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:41:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8BF427A9; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:41:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com (mail-ej1-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05644013F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:41:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id qa43so17504867ejc.12 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:41:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4z/g5kmkzNjD1FM3FgpIsuaUnRSj/3WYSm4BceK/+8w=; b=aHdai/NNbZnATTjxGVL8toOBSM48crJ/IJId4RShrsKlQHwPKKFvnI9Bqk7Agv/H3p iOBMe/vlSRe3/h0i5X7uXao94OVEcO9Nh8Rj6ZB5eePTdFP/0mbuPP/dHvsZO/fyykwF EfjLmm7r3kED7zlYQ7GciYw0JwhfMNm9q260o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4z/g5kmkzNjD1FM3FgpIsuaUnRSj/3WYSm4BceK/+8w=; b=cEPOihfA7Okr7lv/RjyU0Gt+cYrWKJbQP1QJWwV5E21rggKws05ySFRMMWEihJDLLf i6EUSonkPdH8atXyyMNE3nan0gs5WiJBwxdHStn9QRv/q+h7YY2k1XyuRMMC6kqYwayk v0EZ31WzMOR2k3OFgoK2nqhqtPYf/9PNlFqrhp1alPQ5TLt6hzNrg531o1F8MdJv8AHw mqngBb0RgZKalK6dVrE4gqoCIxbkK25sMkH+NkbwviURAKO69JjvdlPZEjbVr3SLz8X+ HU1VnyQ1Hdfk5E5ZrFGhGh5y+wFfVGFQeGHwPasdqXPlA92zlTBJmkmsvc16yyqiTQqR Kc8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ArPQA/cKmmKAOoowCP/WBEfpuMy7XGoB43fAHbjp3veBmVpNe 6XRvc7UW+zflQax6xIPmCg0JWOuJewJ51i7g7X7zhlOl7c0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs5S3Ty80xqwGLfA0w/f0yW9X07AyRKPPeoANJpqgZU1X5ZZts1PQ1ELskzXouDp7TdU9m6rgJWD46llqVXfc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1c57:b0:69f:2625:3f67 with SMTP id l23-20020a1709061c5700b0069f26253f67mr29992870ejg.632.1646401285105; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:41:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:41:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Failing virtIO test case To: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c1d1ba05d964ab0d" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000c1d1ba05d964ab0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello All, We are aware of the VirtIO test case that is failing on the Intel x86 infrastructure. This was recently deployed (Wednesday) and the configuration that worked in the pre-deployment trials is not working the same way in production. The test case has been disabled and Owen will continue to debug on Monday. Cheers, Lincoln -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --000000000000c1d1ba05d964ab0d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hel= lo All,

We are aware of t= he VirtIO test case that is failing on the Intel x86 infrastructure.=C2=A0 = This=C2=A0was recently deployed (Wednesday) and the configuration that work= ed in the pre-deployment=C2=A0trials is not working the same way in product= ion.=C2=A0 The test case has been disabled and Owen will continue to debug = on Monday.

=
Cheers,
Lin= coln

--
Lincoln Lavoie
<= div>Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., St= e. 100, Durham, NH 03824
+1-60= 3-674-2755 (m)

--000000000000c1d1ba05d964ab0d--