* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 [not found] <20210808192658.284547-1-thomas@monjalon.net> @ 2021-08-17 6:34 ` David Marchand 2021-08-17 12:04 ` Lincoln Lavoie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: David Marchand @ 2021-08-17 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Monjalon, ci; +Cc: dev, Ray Kinsella On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:27 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..d707a554ef > --- /dev/null > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ [snip] > +Known Issues > +------------ > + > +.. This section should contain new known issues in this release. Sample format: > + > + * **Add title in present tense with full stop.** > + > + Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the known issue > + in the present tense. Add information on any known workarounds. > + > + This section is a comment. Do not overwrite or remove it. > + Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. > + ======================================================= > + > + The known issue "**Last mbuf segment not implicitly reset.**" added in 21.08 release notes still applies to 21.11. But this can be fixed later, patches are starting to accumulate and some CI failures are due to patches being applied to 21.08. The rest lgtm, so: Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Applied, thanks. On this last subject, this mail is a ping to CI labs owners. 21.11 release won't preserve ABI compat with previous releases, so please disable ABI checks until 22.02. -- David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 2021-08-17 6:34 ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 David Marchand @ 2021-08-17 12:04 ` Lincoln Lavoie 2021-08-17 15:19 ` David Marchand 2021-08-24 7:58 ` David Marchand 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Lincoln Lavoie @ 2021-08-17 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Marchand; +Cc: Thomas Monjalon, ci, dev, Ray Kinsella [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2068 bytes --] Hi David, ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, ABI hasn't been run. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:34 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:27 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > wrote: > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..d707a554ef > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ > > [snip] > > > +Known Issues > > +------------ > > + > > +.. This section should contain new known issues in this release. Sample > format: > > + > > + * **Add title in present tense with full stop.** > > + > > + Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the known issue > > + in the present tense. Add information on any known workarounds. > > + > > + This section is a comment. Do not overwrite or remove it. > > + Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. > > + ======================================================= > > + > > + > > The known issue "**Last mbuf segment not implicitly reset.**" added in > 21.08 release notes still applies to 21.11. > But this can be fixed later, patches are starting to accumulate and > some CI failures are due to patches being applied to 21.08. > > The rest lgtm, so: > Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> > > Applied, thanks. > > > On this last subject, this mail is a ping to CI labs owners. > 21.11 release won't preserve ABI compat with previous releases, so > please disable ABI checks until 22.02. > > > -- > David Marchand > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) <https://www.iol.unh.edu> [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3699 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 2021-08-17 12:04 ` Lincoln Lavoie @ 2021-08-17 15:19 ` David Marchand 2021-08-17 16:02 ` Ali Alnubani 2021-08-24 7:58 ` David Marchand 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: David Marchand @ 2021-08-17 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lincoln Lavoie; +Cc: Thomas Monjalon, ci, dev, Ray Kinsella, Ali Alnubani On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > > Hi David, > > ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, ABI hasn't been run. I don't think we can easily clean those reports in patchwork. Copying Ali, in case he has an idea but otherwise we can live with this. Thanks Lincoln. -- David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 2021-08-17 15:19 ` David Marchand @ 2021-08-17 16:02 ` Ali Alnubani 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ali Alnubani @ 2021-08-17 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Marchand, Lincoln Lavoie, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon Cc: ci, dev, Ray Kinsella Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 6:20 PM > To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> > Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org; > dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>; Ali Alnubani > <alialnu@nvidia.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. > Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could > have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those failure > marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, ABI hasn't been > run. > > I don't think we can easily clean those reports in patchwork. > Copying Ali, in case he has an idea but otherwise we can live with this. > We can override each check by another one with "success" as the status and "skipped" as the description maybe? > Thanks Lincoln. > > > -- > David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 2021-08-17 12:04 ` Lincoln Lavoie 2021-08-17 15:19 ` David Marchand @ 2021-08-24 7:58 ` David Marchand 2021-08-24 12:19 ` Lincoln Lavoie 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: David Marchand @ 2021-08-24 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lincoln Lavoie, dpdklab Cc: Thomas Monjalon, ci, dev, Ray Kinsella, Aaron Conole Hello Lincoln, On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > > Hi David, > > ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, ABI hasn't been run. I can see new reports for ABI, please can someone from UNH double check? https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18301/ https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18303/ https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18325/ -- David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 2021-08-24 7:58 ` David Marchand @ 2021-08-24 12:19 ` Lincoln Lavoie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Lincoln Lavoie @ 2021-08-24 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Marchand Cc: dpdklab, Thomas Monjalon, ci, dev, Ray Kinsella, Aaron Conole, Owen Hilyard [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1316 bytes --] Hi David, We'll check. Owen was working on a change to allow ABI to still run for merges onto the 20.11 branch, so the LTS branches can remain stable, while per-patch testing is off for the 21.11 release. Looks like that has a side effect for how these patches were flagged in the system. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:58 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello Lincoln, > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. > Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and > could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" > those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, > ABI hasn't been run. > > I can see new reports for ABI, please can someone from UNH double check? > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18301/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18303/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18325/ > > > -- > David Marchand > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) <https://www.iol.unh.edu> [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3025 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-24 12:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20210808192658.284547-1-thomas@monjalon.net> 2021-08-17 6:34 ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 David Marchand 2021-08-17 12:04 ` Lincoln Lavoie 2021-08-17 15:19 ` David Marchand 2021-08-17 16:02 ` Ali Alnubani 2021-08-24 7:58 ` David Marchand 2021-08-24 12:19 ` Lincoln Lavoie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).