Hi All,

Would "UNH-IOL Performance Lab" be acceptable?  I'm thinking this would be along the lines of Host / Purpose.  So, taking an example, if Acme hosted a build lab, it could be "Acme Build Lab" or something like that.  In terms of project branding, maybe we need to develop some messaging around how the labs are part of the project.  I'm thinking similar to how OPNFV has the "Pharos Labs," which they describe as "a federated NFV testing infrastructure of community labs around the world."  I think the goal would be to describe the labs as a community resource, supporting to DPDK project and it's developers.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:14 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
Note: such patch must be sent to web@dpdk.org.

08/11/2018 08:46, Ali Alnubani:
> --- a/content/perf-lab/_index.md
> +++ b/content/perf-lab/_index.md
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ title = "Performance Lab"
>  weight = "8"
>  +++
> 
> +<center>
> +  {{< button href="https://lab.dpdk.org" >}} CI Dashboard {{< /button >}}
> +</center>

It is important to keep in mind that we support a distributed CI approach.
This lab is an important part of the CI, but we can run other tests
in other labs. That's why I think we must really stick with a specific name
for this lab.
Several names were mentionned so far:
        - performance lab
        - UNH lab
        - reference lab
        - community lab

I think we must decide which name we want to use.
Opinions?




--
*******************************************************************************
Lincoln Lavoie
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies


21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
Mobile: +1-603-674-2755
    

Ars sine scientia nihil est! -- Art without science is nothing.
Scientia sine ars est vacua! -- Science without art is empty.

*******************************************************************************