From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD84A04DC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5139E5AB5; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (mail-il1-f173.google.com [209.85.166.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D344B5AAE for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:31:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id g7so1924440ilr.12 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 05:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qngo0r7d95k+AawTDGoVhcq3sLV/+743eTrPBC0DLFQ=; b=cmEB7PJbacE3WEVJWEht62U5G875u4671D5AL5afN9seXHXHCS4eOdpav3v4gsKL4A kXnO1t25A0i/lzi+7evQbxxz8pIbl6aPXol7z8x48B9uJx61fqrcQ8mHMVwLuEgkYC8R Mzfd4zkP1GO2gOrf91rwlmLqb+xLB5Cl72V9I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qngo0r7d95k+AawTDGoVhcq3sLV/+743eTrPBC0DLFQ=; b=uB4Uid/BTixekAM8gbNuTlHxpaQfTYac4VjwkpQ32aSBL2EGbMBAyVnL/FYcVG76JK AU+fwCprNrNhPIKfEKty59sZAe0jMFg+IHfTIXy/qR/dSS4RvPfRojQs8p7XwcZfzqdb jgsp4xL5mAmeQJ34ILdOlllmUTU6forpRvy+MYHZ6+cvItNpjExxv4/ct3kS4etyvKXQ Ri9n7xoLzSd1EbHuQraY4f5+hVm/yW7WdezYAnRONuq0BqsVZ6xAWaJ77YSizR7A1O4n GVECMOpaRQYfaqVrbHazquHhNisJEE0r/alyCSU/gQulYoZlzVmS/tPT8dQWTiwGMwbM zaCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532u5FwaT326I6vs21oriTKatyl6Rt0giXcy+IyUcqBEyB0pb9zm jBJh8WGKrnuufwl2ErppxOoLnTninmwNMBZzmlfj6fYGRLdbeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtgtRuXInJBsfa2iJ68Z8cUjXhlVY2HfUtCUrojqxGlN+PvvaKVNFhMUuKUf1hdE0DAJzK2IjebO32r5eWye4= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d281:: with SMTP id p1mr1661173ilp.188.1603197116806; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 05:31:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:31:21 -0400 Message-ID: To: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi everyone, Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK? Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is not building testpmd. We are also using the latest commit available for DTS. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu