From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6736A0C50 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130240687; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com (mail-il1-f177.google.com [209.85.166.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA294067A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:55:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id r5so6915323ilc.13 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h2TTufcKDIMnT4dXY5wz0UelKCMlmu0tKMiF3YzQdr0=; b=DvKYh9zBSPu+RRdtyFNhyScFN5MGdiCaMCM9YKrn3XYaqHfJQNlj4abATrajREShwu smpOEeLDSvZ1diGeG9/j00lHVw0oiKL2Z+xaYZUz/55P8wqlt7mDjPmYfD7/4MH+yDvo XJ9vHLCwJ4RDXfl5p57A2Q80iI439YzbozuUY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h2TTufcKDIMnT4dXY5wz0UelKCMlmu0tKMiF3YzQdr0=; b=oTJ1jfeBcp+GzZNC6Z7lcrBqMOp8J5umM9Q6capFxj4CebhGcQPrLg/nT+pISue8qv z7Wx+atxirRu9pgykB9LY34/ce0ow6HZsvfu25RApEYsYAbnYRqDm7fFRUFI86XyrfFF LmcxxUqVUujsri1L8fjrk34LJEyOx2xbpPrxqIAervtJLdjyrA/j+CrL2eE/gAGQuOx1 NQHhcM+lq7/2wDYo+5bdgaykQUQRQ9/S1HVCVhTDXFFewonU4H9t6MROJYJNzT8CLdzt nVUtYfTPOgMu0kFG/bWCYs2kNYdJXexcLbp1V/OFBb3qZO4pABxFHR6KHk4x6ZLl3C7D spGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vM/zJVBWf+7NwamddueC12mINj+Bws8pLETJ+gCPyK7Kp/Qwy Whry7qHLqvUX1G+pgHKyx/0ZaCqlNVDU76U0OWEtig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiQtKFkelVtIhYO5Wjs74fS/+KlAGeC7tjdk9iKzM1TFdnw7Y6QmqZ0rLRWCQyA2b10H5byw+au1mqIf2sqbw= X-Received: by 2002:a92:db4e:: with SMTP id w14mr4918143ilq.188.1627584940167; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2177893.HOMrD9adHb@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2177893.HOMrD9adHb@thomas> From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes - July 29, 2021 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:16 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Please propose the exact split with test report names, > so we can evaluate if the split is convenient, > and check if it is not too much split. Hi Thomas, We were planning on splitting the iol-testing label into four labels: iol-x86_64-compile-testing iol-x86_64-unit-testing iol-aarch64-compile-testing iol-aarch64-unit-testing This change would separate jobs into labels based on the job name. dpdk_meson_compile, dpdk_compile_spdk, mingw64_compile jobs in compile testing, dpdk_unit_test, spdk_unit_test in unit testing. The architectures will be categorized by target instead of host machine. If you have any suggestions to get a more convenient split, please let us know. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu