From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644CBA04C7 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:28:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8951C10D; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:28:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com (mail-il1-f177.google.com [209.85.166.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08991C0DB for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id y9so3413606ilq.2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:28:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jXwWReQf1xXk+7fUDrLLKfQ1QwVa5zJYf27pSZiDnk4=; b=i0/t71vmH55uW1d9UBYsnQT2T8dsW4pk77un5zsch7sxAFqKSvuj+9my8C7uGO6nd8 SL13qqgAqflFOBp+YVE6SC+/+TMcAj9IAj7+OYs0yk3Pg07mSe5k0D4Ujm5M+QeN/PyN t2Q/nNXq4/hrjQwKe2xYaPINvy+SkQ4YCK0RM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jXwWReQf1xXk+7fUDrLLKfQ1QwVa5zJYf27pSZiDnk4=; b=Moy/9d3GTUW9s0jXKeo98KDkvt6SOVedCaHwjCS26tmrqNPcHMWznJWsQ41J8/p7hd qtk4WmOrNKBZX+/TxCmlx3xz8IOub0v25OC3xfSB4LiHFKxLZY6aGcbxXvhvfAYZCM7f eaCh8qOj5/OO7FJ2crhw6MnHsoXRhuHhViKNFSWin0pm5fXEakIYE6CYgtimSJmPxThI Rg7ZztknGKSH9z37UIbv25bCiqGfirD95EitIOUwW5BSqmchnwZCKIv8FyyGdVnDwK05 5WnKAzgQ3Biv7e5eXbscZenrZV9mmE83hkXr8Plhlyl/mChyXdW6Mr6KWap+1n2yenQk KPvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wkSkIXBTyOBQStwvJXKWkLH3ydbizkwp9Wt//fHqxkqr+aHfs OPVAKtRshGgWcgSquX11agWSlhgYGXQ6GebR97Nj3zR/8iQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl1R1+qW58+9TbYzcGLxxM28sROT1GK3qXuQmTi3OxeM4I+A2Etb7E+QEm6xq2BRN4opRT3VI126vJIOA1XKU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:108f:: with SMTP id r15mr15483347ilj.188.1600182035778; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:00:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:59 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Arch Linux failures X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi David, We have fixed the issue with Arch and are rerunning the affected tests. You should see the reports coming in soon. I will keep an eye out for failures while it goes through testing. Thanks, Brandon On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:59 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > > We are aware of a failure with the Arch Linux testing. This has been disabled in the pipelines for now, and we are looking into the issue. Apologizes for the false negative tests, but you can safely ignore those from the last 24 hours. > > Ah thanks, I wanted to send a mail about this, last Friday.. > Will the failed tests be rerun? > > > -- > David Marchand > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu