From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091A0A04B5 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:04:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5504140DF4; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:04:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEBF140DE9 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:04:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id q137so4667894iod.9 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:04:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eF3wGXL/w4+8MQq3YZXU2sH49RVOCntfR7Za35Qlvvw=; b=DhblJdxR0DYWJPgLCtn5yIfqulRXyUzVE0w4Tfr+Q1LYcG5N6WRhdqG6QeKMoc/dXL j7Za6j/1KZDN5R/u+wsYqtW+r/kosK3ZA9YCsPMkB5qtDX9YGwHId5DnzWZmC0U80wuV OafuOI3NcPPuCQlkltqR7/hlssR3mTptv9YoQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eF3wGXL/w4+8MQq3YZXU2sH49RVOCntfR7Za35Qlvvw=; b=BvoBjkLTYR9AiNdAjzxitMi9PBlnhdVfhyIsXSB5Mw5WggNb2iakhk3APTOp3kxZlZ OVkJ9qBZ4hc9JwkPYQuRODZl2J5O5GqfTCLS2lboJhm1HJm60x6+aTcsdp6K3n6QgKpC gQDpiRz69DWe6ztB0gDVz+kjm/MIqEMwX5YVt1RNvfvKcqh99lLgUS0iWBdhlTFwJdlD UBbOWvHepG4fpTHWKx0hnPuwWL2q7jTCPZOtbj1I49y7Yz9vCxKaFoGwdqZumnm9toYb pmBtqcf/hJ3zC9E4sTqyeBmhFJeC25w2hU0jY2/ApjiSzfi++ue0tIxwwJKUVYbt9wKO Birw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530M1eJoGLZiYIIRu2aClMn/xDmj7M+Gd+3CS+G/PwsZRVmhSPKW r3uy1jOtl1xIHLR4V7Gw+LdwIfkj3kMwQK1oTNM8Wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsEdFh9Jb1U3thaIGLnViq7VZDGZ4t7NIl14Do9vq0MCk3QD0U8I4GpUf6PM+BFbCV9mbqxfmmR9tNY6ozsd0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1247:: with SMTP id o7mr4466804jas.31.1610463894485; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:04:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1644284.PAb6cUpU8L@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1644284.PAb6cUpU8L@thomas> From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:04:18 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Functional test issues X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi Thomas, We have rerun the tests for this patch and they have succeeded. The initial failure was caused by a timeout related to Scapy, possibly due to the machine somehow losing access to Scapy during a test run. We are investigating to solve the root issue. I will continue to monitor the test results to ensure that we do not have any more false negatives. Thanks, Brandon On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a doubt why the patch https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86125/ > has some functional test issues in the community lab: > ci/iol-mellanox-Functional fail Functional Testing issues > > Please could you check what is the cause and try another run? > > Thank you > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu