From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4811FA0547 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:17:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B4C41143; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:17:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8294111F for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:17:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id l7so10982738iln.8 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:17:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8te16deWhr0rOfyfhJy/3idLWfWD1nczVt075PrLUqo=; b=f45zAWxJfN9QxuHPBT1egEaRDvTX6ytxLlMROo7MzH1U4LZjq4dUaWr3NXKIixPVqU sNELz9fEEQhxc0JWbqfbZMdoBfVkl8r6CZ4ZsiQwqtOA4440TjUf48p/Uas4T8SPSegl Sr7uAnafbItSiOV/rqXkP6fD7bwBpzMHRNyyY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8te16deWhr0rOfyfhJy/3idLWfWD1nczVt075PrLUqo=; b=zTk8JkKKcMu4WjC5c4SI18mc19QBf58bd99KFGhc11zDugPQK+6qVLt8hGfsjhLA7B WTghYff6epZYwQIfec+m0Xl79Y5/uoM+6ON8+OGZzsa8gUOtUQ27VeO1R6J1ohmoEpkr wHWLcpeqFfO3La0ggmv7Tmxy9TXJkBF6QXsw73IG93oqvC7eUfRaWTYx9F9G/tEiYHXv datgTAkWxEKlPlu4KUCP5uv0lSUKxZtRcSdqxSQ7cyw4/CM0fkT1UxVtc6mOk1TvxjB4 AVxBNGCTw8Z2RB1uELOS59TA1RK5xvCaxdfx75prdpD/+XFByhSpni5qtBO4mJ+E36TR fsfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dI3ArbnPRNtfDF3iV8+wdXKf7KTBrfVloqYqBQ84HuSigQUgH TNoomVmwLaQx1OS8iGHYC/1j3jPzwTzj/1M5wJ1xnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGyU3xypJ1Fl7WdSBax6QFq5EeMRoqmi2sJYVfBBsNk6iLmSl3dmJLnpGNx/ajGuT/B0i3b5IjMB/BGsOt4zo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:158c:: with SMTP id m12mr8436135ilu.64.1635520671821; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:17:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5655171d8f9b40958328e2e32319bd00@pantheon.tech> <1f55b7025c85464c8f1aebabdf296b5a@pantheon.tech> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:17:15 -0400 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] SVE Testing Temporarily Disabled X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi Juraj, That sounds good to me. I can see how the queue plays after enabling the sve test again with these new changes. This will probably happen early next week, just so that I can watch over it throughout the work week. I will also let you know if I am going to migrate over to the cross-compile solution in the future. Thanks, Brandon On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:56 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 wrote: > > Hi Brandon, > > I don't think we can get it lower using this approach, since we disabled = everything we could. Can we try enabling the job again and see whether a qu= eue builds up? > > I mentioned another approach in the CI call - do a cross compilation on x= 86 (which is fast), then use those artifacts in the emulated docker environ= ment to run the lpm test. Lincoln mentioned you'd plan sometime in the futu= re and this would surely be good enough. In the meantime, we could use the = above approach if it's good enough, execution time-wise. > > Juraj > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brandon Lo > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 3:55 PM > > To: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com > > Subject: Re: SVE Testing Temporarily Disabled > > > > Hi Juraj, > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. Now, all steps (compile and test) take ~15 m= inutes in > > total. The original time was ~1 hour. > > Do you believe this is good enough for now, or do you want to try to ge= t it > > lower? > > > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:14 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brandon, > > > > > > I've looked into reducing the compile time in the SVE job. We don't n= eed to > > build everything, just the lpm lib and hns3 driver. Could you try addin= g "- > > Ddisable_libs=3D* -Denable_drivers=3Dnet/hns3" to and removing "-Dexamp= les=3Dall" > > from the meson compile command and test how much this helps? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Juraj > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Brandon Lo > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:40 PM > > > > To: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; > > Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com > > > > Subject: Re: SVE Testing Temporarily Disabled > > > > > > > > Hi Juraj, > > > > > > > > Yes, this is the emulated SVE environment within containers. > > > > Now that the backlog has been reduced, I can look at ways to reduce > > > > run time or prevent another backlog for when this is enabled again. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brandon > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 4:02 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Brandon, > > > > > > > > > > Is this the compile + one test in an aarch64 with SVE emulated > > environment? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Juraj > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Brandon Lo > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 7:53 PM > > > > > > To: ci@dpdk.org; Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > > > Subject: SVE Testing Temporarily Disabled > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently the SVE testing takes quite a bit of time to complete > > > > > > which takes up slots from UNH. > > > > > > We have temporarily disabled the testing in an attempt to reduc= e > > > > > > the > > > > backlog. > > > > > > Afterwards, we will look into ways to reduce the overall time n= eeded. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Brandon > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Brandon Lo > > > > > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > > > > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu > > > > > > www.iol.unh.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Brandon Lo > > > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu > > > > www.iol.unh.edu > > > > > > > > > -- > > Brandon Lo > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu > > www.iol.unh.edu > --=20 Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu