From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900B2A0566 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F511BFF9; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612601BF96 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:46:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id v3so6952519iom.13 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3bEk2so+doaGve0CGGwnRIgkmCLb3apMggdh5staIHk=; b=DrgBNF4o1s3hJ3/clfsGD6NNhaIZFL3Mg3A3rjA4bG7awss2BCMTxB8xWNWA/5T+W6 NkOsCpn/ea9Q6RzFxA77YLLkG+Q+eHNsP8b4Kx9cykQ41hAPjgNltwTKNnrNHWG4roOb Gmj11BB/nhBhXuWUVzuRNa0A38WR2W+OdvrlI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3bEk2so+doaGve0CGGwnRIgkmCLb3apMggdh5staIHk=; b=gKtNUseIBiS6rbQghqfC8KScRMSLdoIYO8reMh5od1OE4S8wi6zezl7D3be2N6qcc5 gP5DAFkRNGnibLp6Z9I6UJfCNh7VwiuQHVQHFikZfEciZjJ8nDjDb7k9sokUzYVkkL7o T4qQUPBO/Z3eWBwB7WkvRTG8B4KH9v4fZxjT+VXMb5h/M3baavyg6wjFm/iVsaOgwdZD AYly1CptABXLYiuN9pln3r7cuCHiSQJqIqGIetCsaij7crSlKsIa7f8Sby2nxw92+vQK pVTbL11GcM2KfbhpI09tU3g45ICvFWUP5+woY28FVfKrtbK76L+RZzHH/9rWNG67yxaT eYXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2V+5LKw4oiYeSgGdbAhkwgK1esczLcXivT1KV9Fj6F7zLft338 GBl14xIldRQe7JWL4WSW5HBv+CWKwrsZk5zlU7I1Pg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu614asPStY+wJlvXQ0vYBiWa9Ys6VUFHtT64SoqXyqycZt12TfINAwZNWxU3UCUvkxBMWA3VHw8nU9XQlruzU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:150c:: with SMTP id g12mr18079390iow.149.1583851609725; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:46:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1827408.xz2uEaWSZ7@xps> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EAB066@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EBB4AF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:46:13 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: "Chen, Zhaoyan" , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu, Lincoln Lavoie , Thomas Monjalon , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Tu, Lijuan" , "Xu, Qian Q" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009334e505a08130a4" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --0000000000009334e505a08130a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Zhaoyan, How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES? Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues? Thanks On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo wrote: > Hi David, > > This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself > after a test fast enough before another test. > I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's > stable enough to be put back online. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo wrote: >> > >> > Hi David and Zhaoyan, >> > >> > >> > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled >> testing for the Intel testbed. >> > >> > The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications. >> >> Any news about this? >> >> I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header). >> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/ >> >> But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test. >> >> -- >> David Marchand >> >> > > -- > > Brandon Lo > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > > blo@iol.unh.edu > > www.iol.unh.edu > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --0000000000009334e505a08130a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Zhaoyan,

How is the current status o= f the Intel 82599ES?
Were there any configuration changes made to= fix performance issues?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 1= 0, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <blo@io= l.unh.edu> wrote:
Hi David,

This was just a we= ird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast e= nough before another test.
I'll rerun the tests that were aff= ected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back o= nline.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM= David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo = <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>
>
> Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled t= esting for the Intel testbed.
>
> The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.

Any news about this?

I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).<= br> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchse= ts/9900/

But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.

--
David Marchand



--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laborator= y

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu



--

Brandon Lo

UNH = InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

<= a href=3D"http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target=3D"_blank">www.iol.unh.edu

--0000000000009334e505a08130a4--