From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E275CA0567 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:12:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59DA1BFF5; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:12:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B7F1BF7F for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:12:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f21so8512190iol.6 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8p4OtfqjfOFOD9w6nXvAAjpW6zp4ZdqpW1dzpEQTwAc=; b=HJODB/lkCgghf5VDEBuF/Fmd5gT2Wig5PGXYjV9o7en97D+PsP4mrPdGrkUY7gVNmc 7iAb5aOvaGYmMvf8mSej3U47roQOpFg0DlA5zSI6s/gpvQSmYLtLXOhnJ/mXSzyQsJAA j+4VTv7ziXtmV2jZI/cNxVsiihnAMG2P1q/xA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8p4OtfqjfOFOD9w6nXvAAjpW6zp4ZdqpW1dzpEQTwAc=; b=UeBto/pOMPEfGjpSxD5hLAIR1Zk732P9lBfxN9hgE7ESjBaD8nqRdRkAB0JOTz9YoS UYuLq7CBmTzQfa480m7kiqrJcvKFGaypimyJtGVIBuoxasyu2cPvJKdNijBczsv7H7Ec XGNqGHdfRiX7lwpxp1shYOIQX32euk3oR4zYrArShpf/ZFwbiR4P68h3FXPWXzvtBzi5 oytPq71pIupFdA8IlZcCgToAB1hZe+IjVoPSecuabRtVxMNEbb7wKT4gZPgOG0BTa/zd Tsg1ne800+zJukbWNwr/Ghkw0IhhpDbtLRyY0zYaUKiDTkYRZMa7reLd++zzbSZ9TQ24 FtYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Y4nkVPY5rWuI5GhbXTX0hekvUiOD16EduKMrWkKn/QIfMgd1i Xwg7XanisDj43kkmmycqa3UQ1nzuODexOK3fLwAMHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu/0bygztK6D1NLj4Ce6T5xZXgPTHeiBd6dGuHPu44a8qxU88DwSg075E7kK+O06PWeISJ2UpZ5Q979ElN5iz4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1217:: with SMTP id y23mr18315163iot.34.1583845937118; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1827408.xz2uEaWSZ7@xps> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EAB066@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EBB4AF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:11:40 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: "Chen, Zhaoyan" , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu, Lincoln Lavoie , Thomas Monjalon , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Tu, Lijuan" , "Xu, Qian Q" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000761b8e05a07fde44" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000761b8e05a07fde44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi David, This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough before another test. I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online. Thanks On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > > > Hi David and Zhaoyan, > > > > > > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled > testing for the Intel testbed. > > > > The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications. > > Any news about this? > > I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header). > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/ > > But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test. > > -- > David Marchand > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --000000000000761b8e05a07fde44 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi David,

This was just a weird issue w= ith the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough befor= e another test.
I'll rerun the tests that were affected and k= eep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marc= hand <david.marchand@redhat= .com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>
>
> Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled t= esting for the Intel testbed.
>
> The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.

Any news about this?

I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).<= br> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchse= ts/9900/

But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.

--
David Marchand



--

Brandon Lo

UNH = InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

<= a href=3D"http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target=3D"_blank">www.iol.unh.edu

--000000000000761b8e05a07fde44--