From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8031A04AA for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874AF1BE85; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f193.google.com (mail-il1-f193.google.com [209.85.166.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5307B255 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:31:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f193.google.com with SMTP id l4so15806687ilq.2 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=evl3MAAYwHLzqcieCQ9hjTE1E9ymQGyPf8ylLY1Q0og=; b=CjXUC4mBIThA/1l4DJEa9XpGmp2CpFqGlzzq/Ef/mrJA0ChcCkdDSp7b6bBGBj5J6j 2bvkCMs+lubGyLCp6g0l0a1FXbKSLJv4PqU+znF+aYq6a1BIeEdYajAXiCpGx+qUzYN+ lVNwUbMjwbHrNLNFyZtZd1L97JE+c4j+HQqhw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=evl3MAAYwHLzqcieCQ9hjTE1E9ymQGyPf8ylLY1Q0og=; b=JT1ziBtVyQFA0uJupHtxzCZlivb7SQH0Fb3VaY1cf4zjb7HbjAr2wmr9eoBdvpWSXD GY2CHwmk1AjlZbTga0doS+hmFmDkaLaL8Q4/eQtvbxsKFynnq2chWguGv9MvUVAdxVMB yejsVvNOO6KvbqXVmq6hdKL+lE5adwu2sbwK4LnQvOKDGU2EZUrQxrDyQF560YoSF3bJ w/Qcwuo76cII7J9ILsG4P2DXMoLSB7PSPAT1Dd+bdOXLPdwfU+0KKsT2QBLnKw1hpODN OEBZd+ykdv2bUbj9hQt6JlhKtisPzb7prhnnYv6qwQnYDCnDD+caCzvNoru6lfuJOMZ5 u3mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+vmQLLstaX1A+SEJKMJ9PZURcOjYrCc+tT245bn+i05jt4Y2K WMbOxuLqtt+nW4K46dSPi8fOmp7eP0xWCi1BVVFzCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu8XsecLVr0VbsWF628cOkrwx8khR1urCIFeiaed+i53L2HgBZb8nOEsUMFYWWRZ4wlD3F60pSMURZBzwGSzc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:9f1d:: with SMTP id u29mr23532634ili.20.1599579117685; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:31:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:31:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: "Chautru, Nicolas" Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Gcc error false positive from ci/iol-testing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi Nic, Doing a gcc --version gives me this result: gcc (Arch Linux 9.2.1+20200130-2) 9.2.1 20200130 If there is anything I should do to help resolve this issue, please let me = know. Thanks, Brandon On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Chautru, Nicolas wrote: > > Hi, > > I am seeing an odd compilation error reported from ci/iol testing using t= his variant > > Arch Linux > > Kernel: latest > > Compiler: gcc latest > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75690/ > > > > What version of gcc is this build used with exactly so that to be able to= reproduce this? > > It reports a =E2=80=9Cmaybe-uninitialized=E2=80=9D error but I don=E2=80= =99t see that with any other compiler and from the code I cannot see any br= anch which would lead to touch undeclared variable. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Nic --=20 Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu