From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6B6A04BB for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CCA1B222; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com (mail-io1-f47.google.com [209.85.166.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75BD1B1D5 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id g7so13095812iov.13 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:08:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7Zeh3Pz+EaUnyNdn45ZHy65BEv9sT3gFTB0wclinB5k=; b=hUaQ5TORANZTHwPd5M/2cfNy3ovFL75YXurHSfabWBdJdjaVxd6EJRC1P0zqGzm/WB iV6lXuXAwCyA+9dHTdI5A3AYYlj63cvOe4YJYcH2VjGiqlHUbPCaMPJgBj/M1O8VMVjY Y/XTEILiDJ8R9qbnPvfPFM5bLNJxaAOaV+BTs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7Zeh3Pz+EaUnyNdn45ZHy65BEv9sT3gFTB0wclinB5k=; b=QIUsbqcoK1ffdMKQyT1ZT1SVnhJu8soj+ZAWrWtGT3fY9LFibFA1vwbWPplC9kPzyl w4h7BDpWN+Cbrt+QOeEvvG5tYo5LK4HNJuyUjMmGg5RlI4X9E2HVU7E+W0HY8NHWhBus lWKqdvdehCiouJe7eoIt2cbYIA66jFlkUWg65kWy1St4tpMqsr3j2hy/ACMjlXAs4/r5 Ch6Ecgcwcp+SO1FmeWyXostdLvQhhXJ4vTvyH2FtgXD0fD8ND24PSIhysrtdjmYD8fOQ 0htjDjQ+f+oIlR5HahjYK9orO1ylqIb/86TKKQvDvtD55MYNGY5qN3EH/RG0AhS54qb/ NxfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dSJdQ6EmMoBOtIwxKIqxeeO/D6x6ekyA94RGtA4UAVox3qdsw zMcDC+HNlL5t1MeyJlXiG2S1xZ0dRqB+IFUFXxLDWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmEAAkmhX1H+fw8a3FEXa8vQrpLJGy3lgc4ETbx84N/F0jmt8DFQ+PzOXAOxQRYvFXgcGYUmsUKrEWAGVYCT4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:148c:: with SMTP id j12mr1425328jak.70.1601993278950; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4539298.X23b7sF8FS@thomas> In-Reply-To: <4539298.X23b7sF8FS@thomas> From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 10:07:23 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , David Marchand , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Trishan de Lanerolle , James Hendergart Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi everyone, Apologies for the issues this has caused. I have since added the ability to store warning results on the dashboard. I will be resending the result emails. I have also fixed OpenSUSE builds and will be rerunning tests throughout the day. Thanks, Brandon On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie: > > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until > > things catch up on the other branches. Similarly, if we add something like > > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now. > > Sorry, I disagree with this plan. > As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights. > If a new test is not passing, it should not be added > until the original issue is fixed. > > Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error. > > Thanks > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu