From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC24FA04AA for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D284C99; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE6F1DB8 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id b17so15786929ilh.4 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Gkb6aWct7C79MJjJ2Tosa3rCk6ISHpAxDMYm7oc8vIw=; b=Ol0ieV4vi6bz2a9SJ5k104KH7MVH6mLQy4mXzoDF9mARFMvEFjS+Kji9N6+T8r4l0t H16xqKEpEzTJUurOG8BsYpkU2pLex0OC37OkbqnzkofWC5CyKlTFr37twueer+d1VaMG AG5T08091C3Egw3nBcHljcZxiemnNAtyCa0Jg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gkb6aWct7C79MJjJ2Tosa3rCk6ISHpAxDMYm7oc8vIw=; b=KbF/ZA8igCmxrjlAn5+oidmoPIjJjyVpdvmD/TAXHMGb8AUVzLVbobi3gEABZZDRJS 4JVRnro4S8UhvibocpxkPismgWTHtcEQaOcOkFHf3/PbcXnuWpTRdUSAzeRX8hTVYE+o tjibTsivY4mmJbJ7DU/qvSU3GKWJFx7WakHWoGj38/kWNHtvRfjSfC6AeX0qQ81gSkx8 Ftj4LXK18B2hOZW7boo8IeOv0k5VOuDtiBp2g7njVY0Na6hzJmfv/ht0Si1HlDt0WsT9 vM254Wet3Jy14eQQauOa3MZT5eFNPOX5bsVbZCl33wc7wDCZPtbSBKKMpAdIiDX30KrK uAyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QZKklQul6iDBjxOoNlCCC/184/eE2FhxL1VXnykgA4aV2omS1 zuJq7j7hD7VnRxBh1QwTX0KW9ln4cIMWrA90bEAzrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxELlExgcJUHYcULX78LuW13miR0Tapq0SLfHdZ77pMHwgWuCKO3Y41Yfr7UNkvztnBgIDb3LSkjAZNGEhFxak= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:66f:: with SMTP id l15mr23778778ilt.234.1599578676200; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:24:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:24:00 -0400 Message-ID: To: "Zhang, XuemingX" Cc: "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "Lilylavoie@iol.unh.edu" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Xu, Qian Q" , "Tu, Lijuan" , "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "Ma, LihongX" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] iol-intel-performance did not send report after 9/3 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi Xueming, I have discovered the problem and am working on a solution. Intel performance testing should be coming back up by today in patchworks. Thanks for letting me know, Brandon On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 3:28 AM Zhang, XuemingX wrote: > > Hi blo and all: > > > > Could you help to check the DPDK `ci/ iol-intel-performance`? No report after 9/3. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > Regards, > > Xueming > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu