Hi David and Zhaoyan, > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled testing for the Intel testbed. The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications. Thanks On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:22 AM David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:58 AM Chen, Zhaoyan > wrote: > >> Thanks Jeremy. >> >> >> >> I quickly checked per-patches results and logs for the failures. That >> seems not always failed case.. like fluctuation. >> >> >> >> For this case, could you help to check >> >> - if BIOS’s turbo boost is off, C0/C1 is off, C6 is off >> >> - if cores’ are isolated in kernel’s parameter >> >> - if other tasks are scheduled on the testbed when running performance >> test >> >> >> >> If all settings are good, we may consider it’s a regression or unstable >> performance issue. We will double check the performance by IXIA with latest >> DPDK master when we back to office (1 week later). >> > > (replaced jeremy @mail with the dpdklab alias). > > Is this issue linked to the failures I see? > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9799/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9800/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9804/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9809/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9814/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9820/ > > > Thanks. > > -- > David Marchand > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu