From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB3A0C47 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:50:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8624014F; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:50:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6942340143 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:50:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r134so452916iod.11 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 10:50:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=042iOxevX1knvLGj7xBUB96C+KaJg9JN887EGAjM0O8=; b=RjrsF7h2Sh7iBYEv1qwLCGtfoImTH9T4uvbcs5agl8CSVX4QJJbQfbP58Q9g01SmTS apvm5YTwKCoMEGQFhdBW8W921Hct+3HxfPyzShUJRLStUpcJ4K/y57NUixYv9nrlX8Ug X627W5+UIxTEemZUlSTRVlpNWQAep9yT8+bq0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=042iOxevX1knvLGj7xBUB96C+KaJg9JN887EGAjM0O8=; b=H2KTxZ/x5mo0/LmUl7x7kT9WLmwd9sIpMoIIIwDF8SqWVoAKHk3DvdiMno/8gpCKzI 0N6wuqNA1LL/8zMZTZecnEAvzXyxir0+IMtNdA2vOU5kyXd9PrUD9lVaZuJIL+bCy79d eiTxsQzAPMxROVHgZWR2PUkNEwxB+A9PeNh0/3cUqGhrelKmEj8GhUvJdMt6D252xAUm lc3XHj8axqeQ7k2Eg5hP4xheSqJRjpZV8GU8ceZiZCqyGIjgo/0LRztBL2NwS8xPhhQ6 zAzfRhXhgbUm3fPV+vWjhA5Fm2ghH5RTxG0aTJV7FfphEGzlbyd+zFp4fL7cq2QkHtdP Vmcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GJZEFfEcw+5jPnJsYd63HauzcUUjwHL0OxltQ7GrfB5UHbI9j xnSmriWfopAoJyZeuUCVmgmyYEISw/t1q0f6XsaTSZAioio= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXMlbLmxyxaawGWUMm3+BZEaaZcn/7Ff8o8snSPLi5pXBtR+mavpO8TIS4E51eRxp/EQupfb/Qp9hHyY29dek= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b784:: with SMTP id h126mr8685055iof.194.1633715405753; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 10:50:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:49:30 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Unit Testing on ARM Temporarily Disabled at UNH X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:44 AM David Marchand wrote: > > Hello Brandon, > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 6:18 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > From the meeting minutes, I can see that you asked about the ARM unit > > testing. ARM unit testing was disabled previously due to a conflict in > > Jenkins which caused fluctuations when running the performance test. > > Unfortunately, my investigations were interrupted by the Jenkins > > update. > > > > Regardless, I have tracked down the issue and am currently working on > > pushing up a fix. I suspect this fix should be up by Friday or early > > next week. > > Ok, thank you. > > Keep me updated when it's enabled again, I want to monitor the > func_reentrancy test on this platform. > There was a recent change in this autotest. > I don't expect this change to fix the issue we had before, but still > worth checking. > > > -- > David Marchand > Hi David, I have pushed up the fix that should resolve the fluctuation conflict within Jenkins. The unit test is now enabled again. Please let me know if I should disable it again in case there are too many failures. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu