From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0D2A0C5A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:59:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0854F4068A; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:59:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com (mail-io1-f51.google.com [209.85.166.51]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8C40689 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id y16so22625887ioc.8 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:59:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nyE5uY3xvFLFRJifNX36hq5g1vz7V2XimP7O9vev/+Y=; b=NbCJUJDZavNHsWmEOIyikwev3vKKGk2viJDNZVtlLbVhHyf/tThVe/LCHc3L9GAMvV iuh30OfscWxV8esRGmi/aF3wJIWpGD0/xe16Le3Lie9qos912uy+RwuPrtEQ78hFmSqa nRl/eeLHnncxW8DnzNXkQA+HtJdVbXDe9EIzM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nyE5uY3xvFLFRJifNX36hq5g1vz7V2XimP7O9vev/+Y=; b=Dxry3SYfQgWystcjFLsArXL1dJlav6+ftRX5fJlrkQx7A6KXE0vsyO9YF31PZaJvsL 40kORXB56p5OBYU7dHZzTHXQS9Sg+WRvW9JPEboKXUJ/Cnb9z6p7go1nkjQBmiGoOGt6 LxfYM/y4KAXQ+cx9iqixmRMrWl2WfeHSXMpJ8uZgd6HcsY4Gc6O7HRWUGbV5HLjpFBuU pqbBmD5L7F7WhCUZB6mKS7B4Xnf8qvqFndPdZvUKhLwwRWete3hyticvpa2GRU0mQlr7 vfBNSidbUcnoeGMThHfBdM8fSmVhWUlTTO3KzbSu+whM/WKwhL3jnvehIscEEH+AtoBu RSaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oZMum1BlBw7j1jzpnk75oiMp8RNpjspPmhIFH/R+adDi1rYAw wqolBnN+NE6VtTnyd+3609b2Rb8mCPu7If2WKj5TFA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyV5NbISRPB9WMlOwsMJ0QpHqtSbYI7Ohv3K88i7bYtBp2ZfFzYUamdx3yoZckhvz/wo6YCAFUWcMUumc80Bf8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:218d:: with SMTP id b13mr62842996iob.19.1638208743920; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:59:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1928246.j4tpOohVRJ@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:58:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures To: "Liguzinski, WojciechX" Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , "Ajmera, Megha" , "Singh, Jasvinder" , dev , Aaron Conole , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Zegota, AnnaX" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:48 AM Liguzinski, WojciechX < wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Thanks Lincoln, I will also have a try with such script. > > > > Cheers, > > Wojciech > > Hello Wojciech, I also recommend trying to run the test with around 4GB of RAM and 2GB of hugepages to see if it fails. That is roughly the number of resources we have per machine that is completely dedicated to unit tests. The amount of RAM available can sometimes increase depending on how many jobs are running per machine, but 4GB is the lowest it can go for the unit test job. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu