From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
To: "Danilewicz, MarcinX" <marcinx.danilewicz@intel.com>,
Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"Ajmera, Megha" <megha.ajmera@intel.com>,
"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
"Zegota, AnnaX" <annax.zegota@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:51:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOeXdvbKHzc9HvQPsEDaW58tST5+EQC0e5ucgfXAS5yhwsO0OQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOE1vsPcKAiTMPGH1VYwoTccWi7b=9DJdObdPJZhKQvqNQsFmw@mail.gmail.com>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:27 PM Danilewicz, MarcinX <marcinx.danilewicz@intel.com> wrote:
>> After some time I did some testing. As you may guess, with real hardware I could not reproduce error.
>>
>> From what I see, the problem was here:
>>
>> FT2
>> RED config, avg queue size, min threshold, max threshold, drop prob %, drop rate %, diff %, tolerance % ,
>> 5 127 32 128 1.6493 0.9900 0.0000 50.0000
>> 6 127 32 128 1.4137 0.8500 0.0000 50.0000
>> 7 127 32 128 1.2370 0.7300 0.0000 50.0000
>> 8 127 32 128 1.0995 0.6200 0.0000 50.0000
>> 9 127 32 128 0.9896 0.6300 0.0000 50.0000
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Drop_rate in line 8 should not be greater than in line 9. However by looking at other results, drop_rate value in line 9 is about 0.1% greater than expected. Line 8 results are fine to me.
>>
>> How often any can see this issue? Is there a chance I could use existing docker container for testing?
Hi Marcin,
Attached is an Ubuntu 20.04 Dockerfile that we use in the lab for unit testing.
I don't think we run into the red_autotest failure too often, so it is
hard to debug. My guess is that the test will randomly fail when there
are a lot of processes running on the system, especially since we run
multiple tests per system in the lab.
In a typical worst-case scenario, we can see a machine performing 2 to
3 total compile/ABI tests along with a single unit test. We do
allocate a specific amount of resources (4GB RAM, 2 cores) to each
container, so that can be another factor that affects the frequency of
these failures.
If this issue seems too dependent on the current system load and other
situational factors, it might be good to think about running the
red_autotest separate from other tests in the lab so it does not have
to compete for resources.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Brandon
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
blo@iol.unh.edu
www.iol.unh.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-826-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
2021-11-12 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-11-12 14:10 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2021-11-12 14:15 ` David Marchand
2021-11-15 11:51 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-15 17:26 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-18 22:10 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-19 7:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-19 16:53 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-19 17:25 ` Lincoln Lavoie
[not found] ` <BN9PR11MB53729251C262EEBB1134A61194619@BN9PR11MB5372.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-11-29 17:58 ` Brandon Lo
2021-11-30 7:51 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-12-10 13:31 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
[not found] ` <SA0PR11MB46708D32B6B2EC31D3DCE17F975A9@SA0PR11MB4670.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB3926999DD139D10AD76D177F8F5B9@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB39261E9379E18C67BB4FB9938F5B9@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB3926DF1466F5815D5D2FEC798F259@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <CAOE1vsPcKAiTMPGH1VYwoTccWi7b=9DJdObdPJZhKQvqNQsFmw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-02-02 14:51 ` Brandon Lo [this message]
2022-02-02 17:07 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-02-03 23:31 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-02-04 0:11 ` Brandon Lo
2022-03-09 10:01 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-03-09 14:48 ` Brandon Lo
2022-03-10 17:25 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2021-11-22 8:17 ` David Marchand
2021-11-22 13:34 ` Lincoln Lavoie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOeXdvbKHzc9HvQPsEDaW58tST5+EQC0e5ucgfXAS5yhwsO0OQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blo@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=annax.zegota@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=marcinx.danilewicz@intel.com \
--cc=megha.ajmera@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).