From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06419A04DC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:19:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F391EBAC2; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f175.google.com (mail-il1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953DEBABE for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:19:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f175.google.com with SMTP id p16so2170357ilq.5 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:19:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ueCYu20Qq7SJ/2XlfXaikee6En090ck21pYEtfalHjQ=; b=KkFWgxP2c4Z6Spy9j5rYvh9IRja1jjCRf8RNQlCcUccMCCIXEiIpkypGQjyEHiiIFJ xeLkMxm7OOzyXmDKKNzT+UeiBNaOSdVr4HOT45HmcXq3Hnvm61w1B59YK/kPqcimKZia Ua+TS+y/PWBYRGt2NY3WESED2c9GD87g3e+10= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ueCYu20Qq7SJ/2XlfXaikee6En090ck21pYEtfalHjQ=; b=EG6A2uErABPOI8P6EDz7jdUq8Av04hv/UeNXyL5WI96m8/goMAqbf4kKW0XyEuGAf0 i6x00rGT4bZNgPMAnRYngAQO9eQ6R2tXkALrhJtNwyrKtnDKPbT3GhtimyjxY9RAyk7/ darx0OW+BY9jycJuezb6EwexyA3lwZl/9/1fzLjf+NTj3naj6Jz1y2/luEx0AeWwsd2N OwoCzHUUSf8YF0VOgeLQ04a76rBo2KPZEIViVZIjFOgG/FJA7TOla8qgZUuZ0uvYTLOs 8PdIxxN4ujG1HycYfFKhALbhnAShyFlCNEqw1SF39Wf8/iNtWYx6UU5jsR/jfLf5m1/a mmeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HjqFEkZwWTZ6ghyNLvVPUzdEIlBKGEUSZq3RB2nuWcQlwH4Ps hkzOLx4NZ6QZkEe4e4db3tWL6Xlxcy8/ZqQtARnklw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaBCl3EF/UWOSnxSZjkBAyC2YvzPc+TDw4W7q1ySwgCLIYsKH/uNfN5kxSbBAFf7RpNQRCFLmNJeRMvVqU55g= X-Received: by 2002:a92:50a:: with SMTP id q10mr2002167ile.20.1603199966931; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:19:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <320640640.vBkTyhWo6Z@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:18:51 -0400 Message-ID: To: Lincoln Lavoie , "Tu, Lijuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000889e5d05b21a1446" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000889e5d05b21a1446 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers. DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that testpmd is in the build's output directory. Thanks, Brandon On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to > testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists. > > Cheers, > Lincoln > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > >> 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK? >> > >> > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile >> > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is >> > not building testpmd. >> > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS. >> >> No testpmd should be built. >> >> >> > > -- > *Lincoln Lavoie* > Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > lylavoie@iol.unh.edu > https://www.iol.unh.edu > +1-603-674-2755 (m) > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --000000000000889e5d05b21a1446 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers.<= br>DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd,=C2=A0and it assumes = that testpmd is in the build's output directory.

Thanks,
Brandon

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Linc= oln Lavoie <ly= lavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
Is this because of the change that adds some python requirem= ents to testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists.=

Cheers,
Lincoln
=

= On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
20/10/2020 14:31, Bran= don Lo:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK?
>
> Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is > not building testpmd.
> We are also using the latest commit available for DTS.

No testpmd should be built.




--
Lincoln Lavoie
Senior Engineer, Broadband Tec= hnologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.ed= u
+1-603-674-2755 (m)



--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laborator= y

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu

--000000000000889e5d05b21a1446--