From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: "Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>,
"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:45:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOeXdvbosqRGouSX06_phVTCam57XUt0s=sf_kpe-VmiwFTgMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOE1vsMjKZGSpK+s_haUsOXh7ZsJDfge97A3suWMGtev4NXK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3996 bytes --]
It seems that all of our DUT machines that build DPDK already have
'python3-pyelftools' installed
Thanks,
Brandon
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:37 AM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
wrote:
> This is the patch I was talking about, where we might now be missing a
> requirement on those systems:
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-October/000815.html
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lijuan,
>>
>> Yes, we have "build_type=meson" in the execution.cfg file.
>>
>> DTS compiles DPDK using these commands:
>> "CC=gcc meson --werror -Denable_kmods=True -Dlibdir=lib
>> --default-library=static x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc"
>> and
>> "ninja -C x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc -j 62"
>>
>> Running functional tests, we get:
>> "x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd: No such file or directory"
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I mean config “build_type=meson” in DTS/execution.cfg, Snice DPDK don’t
>>> support “make” now, we have to use meson build.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ci <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> *On Behalf Of *Tu, Lijuan
>>> *Sent:* 2020年10月20日 21:40
>>> *To:* Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>;
>>> Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
>>> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you use meson build ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
>>> *Sent:* 2020年10月20日 21:19
>>> *To:* Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Tu, Lijuan <
>>> lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
>>> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers.
>>> DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that
>>> testpmd is in the build's output directory.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Brandon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to
>>> testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lincoln
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo:
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK?
>>> >
>>> > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile
>>> > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is
>>> > not building testpmd.
>>> > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS.
>>>
>>> No testpmd should be built.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Lincoln Lavoie*
>>>
>>> Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
>>>
>>> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>>
>>> lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
>>>
>>> https://www.iol.unh.edu
>>>
>>> +1-603-674-2755 (m)
>>>
>>> <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Brandon Lo
>>>
>>> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>>>
>>> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>>
>>> blo@iol.unh.edu
>>>
>>> www.iol.unh.edu
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Brandon Lo
>>
>> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>>
>> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>
>> blo@iol.unh.edu
>>
>> www.iol.unh.edu
>>
>
>
> --
> *Lincoln Lavoie*
> Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
> lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
> https://www.iol.unh.edu
> +1-603-674-2755 (m)
> <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
>
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
blo@iol.unh.edu
www.iol.unh.edu
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13899 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 12:31 Brandon Lo
2020-10-20 12:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-20 12:36 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-20 13:18 ` Brandon Lo
2020-10-20 13:39 ` Tu, Lijuan
2020-10-20 13:53 ` Tu, Lijuan
2020-10-20 13:55 ` Brandon Lo
2020-10-20 15:35 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-20 15:45 ` Brandon Lo [this message]
2020-10-21 0:50 ` Ma, LihongX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOeXdvbosqRGouSX06_phVTCam57XUt0s=sf_kpe-VmiwFTgMA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=blo@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).