Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3488 bytes --]

<snip>

Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊



>

> Hello,

>

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli

> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>> wrote:

> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang

> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com<mailto:Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?

> > > > >

> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.

> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds

> > > > >

> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s

> > > > communication with Travis.

> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.

> > > >

> > > > Can you share details on this?

> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?

> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk

>

> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push"

> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk.

> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with

> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.".

> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got

> cancelled with the same message.

>

> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on

> push).

>

>

> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?

> > This was not requested. Which one do we need?

>

> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important

> (and the more credits-hungry btw).

> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus.

>

>

> > > > What of other individual's forks?

> > I have not discussed this.

> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?

>

> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis.

> This is not required, but nice for contributors.

I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this email to our team and see what they say.



We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution.



>

>

> >

> > >

> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check

> > > and get back.

> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.

> > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected.

> > > >

> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for

> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is

> > > > linked to my

> > > account.

> > Can you please provide a link to this?

>

> You can see here:

> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests

> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests

>

>

> --

> David Marchand



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8663 bytes --]