Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊 > > Hello, > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > > > > > > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > > > > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > > > > communication with Travis. > > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > > > > > > Can you share details on this? > > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > > I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push" > option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. > Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with > "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". > I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got > cancelled with the same message. > > So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on > push). > > > > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > > This was not requested. Which one do we need? > > I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important > (and the more credits-hungry btw). > DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > > > > > > What of other individual's forks? > > I have not discussed this. > > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > > I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. > This is not required, but nice for contributors. I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this email to our team and see what they say. We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check > > > and get back. > > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > > > > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is > > > > linked to my > > > account. > > Can you please provide a link to this? > > You can see here: > https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests > > > -- > David Marchand