* [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status @ 2021-01-22 7:28 Ruifeng Wang 2021-01-22 7:48 ` David Marchand 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Ruifeng Wang @ 2021-01-22 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: aconole; +Cc: ci, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd, nd [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 423 bytes --] Hi Aaron, Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm's communication with Travis. DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. Just want to know if it works as expected. Thanks. Regards, Ruifeng [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2717 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-22 7:28 [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status Ruifeng Wang @ 2021-01-22 7:48 ` David Marchand 2021-01-22 8:05 ` Ruifeng Wang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David Marchand @ 2021-01-22 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ruifeng Wang; +Cc: aconole, ci, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> wrote: > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s communication with Travis. > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. Can you share details on this? Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? What of other individual's forks? > > Just want to know if it works as expected. From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my account. -- David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-22 7:48 ` David Marchand @ 2021-01-22 8:05 ` Ruifeng Wang 2021-01-22 14:16 ` Aaron Conole 2021-01-22 14:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Ruifeng Wang @ 2021-01-22 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Marchand; +Cc: aconole, ci, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd, nd > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM > To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > Cc: aconole@redhat.com; ci@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > wrote: > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > communication with Travis. > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > Can you share details on this? > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > What of other individual's forks? Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get back. Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for DPDK/dpdk and > ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my account. > > > -- > David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-22 8:05 ` Ruifeng Wang @ 2021-01-22 14:16 ` Aaron Conole 2021-01-22 14:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-22 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ruifeng Wang; +Cc: David Marchand, ci, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> >> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM >> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> >> Cc: aconole@redhat.com; ci@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli >> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> >> wrote: >> > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? >> > >> > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. >> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds >> > >> > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s >> communication with Travis. >> > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. >> >> Can you share details on this? >> Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? >> Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? >> What of other individual's forks? > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get back. > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. Looks like it hasn't. And I see a message like: Builds have been temporarily disabled for public repositories due to a negative credit balance So... there's that. >> >> > >> > Just want to know if it works as expected. >> >> From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for DPDK/dpdk and >> ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my account. >> >> >> -- >> David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-22 8:05 ` Ruifeng Wang 2021-01-22 14:16 ` Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-22 14:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 2021-01-25 9:44 ` David Marchand 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Honnappa Nagarahalli @ 2021-01-22 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ruifeng Wang, David Marchand; +Cc: aconole, ci, nd, Honnappa Nagarahalli <snip> > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > > wrote: > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > > communication with Travis. > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > > Can you share details on this? > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? This was not requested. Which one do we need? > > What of other individual's forks? I have not discussed this. Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get > back. > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my > account. Can you please provide a link to this? > > > > > > -- > > David Marchand > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-22 14:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli @ 2021-01-25 9:44 ` David Marchand 2021-01-26 13:56 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David Marchand @ 2021-01-25 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Honnappa Nagarahalli, aconole, Thomas Monjalon, Yigit, Ferruh Cc: Ruifeng Wang, ci, nd Hello, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > > > > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > > > communication with Travis. > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > > > > Can you share details on this? > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push" option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got cancelled with the same message. So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on push). > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > This was not requested. Which one do we need? I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important (and the more credits-hungry btw). DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > > > What of other individual's forks? > I have not discussed this. > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. This is not required, but nice for contributors. > > > > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get > > back. > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my > > account. > Can you please provide a link to this? You can see here: https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests -- David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-25 9:44 ` David Marchand @ 2021-01-26 13:56 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 2021-01-26 14:29 ` Aaron Conole 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Honnappa Nagarahalli @ 2021-01-26 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Marchand, aconole, thomas, Yigit, Ferruh; +Cc: Ruifeng Wang, ci, nd [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3488 bytes --] <snip> Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊 > > Hello, > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com<mailto:Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > > > > > > > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > > > > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > > > > communication with Travis. > > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > > > > > > Can you share details on this? > > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > > I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push" > option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. > Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with > "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". > I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got > cancelled with the same message. > > So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on > push). > > > > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > > This was not requested. Which one do we need? > > I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important > (and the more credits-hungry btw). > DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > > > > > > What of other individual's forks? > > I have not discussed this. > > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > > I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. > This is not required, but nice for contributors. I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this email to our team and see what they say. We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check > > > and get back. > > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > > > > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is > > > > linked to my > > > account. > > Can you please provide a link to this? > > You can see here: > https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests > > > -- > David Marchand [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8663 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-26 13:56 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli @ 2021-01-26 14:29 ` Aaron Conole 2021-01-26 16:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-26 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: David Marchand, thomas, Yigit, Ferruh, Ruifeng Wang, ci, nd Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> writes: > <snip> > > Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊 > > > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > >> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote: > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > >> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > >> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s > >> > > > communication with Travis. > >> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > >> > > > > >> > > > Can you share details on this? > >> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > >> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > >> > >> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push" > >> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. > >> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with > >> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". > >> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got > >> cancelled with the same message. > >> > >> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on > >> push). > >> > >> > >> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > >> > This was not requested. Which one do we need? > >> > >> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important > >> (and the more credits-hungry btw). > >> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > >> > >> > >> > > > What of other individual's forks? > >> > I have not discussed this. > >> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > >> > >> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. > >> This is not required, but nice for contributors. > > I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and > Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed > to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this > email to our team and see what they say. > > > > We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are > other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see > if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution. That's good to know. We have been discussing internally what to do when Github Actions inevitably goes the same way as Travis (pay $$$ or no builds), and I'm happy to hear that you have a permanent solution in mind. > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check > >> > > and get back. > >> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > >> > > > > >> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > >> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is > >> > > > linked to my > >> > > account. > >> > Can you please provide a link to this? > >> > >> You can see here: > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests > >> > >> > >> -- > >> David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status 2021-01-26 14:29 ` Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-26 16:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Honnappa Nagarahalli @ 2021-01-26 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Conole; +Cc: David Marchand, thomas, Yigit, Ferruh, Ruifeng Wang, ci, nd <snip> > > Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> writes: > > > <snip> > > > > Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing > > things on the list 😊 > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > > > >> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > > > >> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been > disabled? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > >> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of > >> > > > > Arm’s > > > >> > > > communication with Travis. > > > >> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Can you share details on this? > > > >> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > > > >> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > > > >> > > > >> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on > push" > > > >> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. > > > >> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled > >> with > > > >> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". > > > >> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job > >> which got > > > >> cancelled with the same message. > > > >> > > > >> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly > >> build, no build on > > > >> push). > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > > > >> > This was not requested. Which one do we need? > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more > >> important > > > >> (and the more credits-hungry btw). > > > >> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > What of other individual's forks? > > > >> > I have not discussed this. > > > >> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > > > >> > > > >> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. > > > >> This is not required, but nice for contributors. > > > > I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been > > happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info > > on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to > > DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being > monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I > will pass this email to our team and see what they say. > > > > > > > > We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. > > It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too > > which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to > ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers. > This will be a permanent solution. > > That's good to know. We have been discussing internally what to do when > Github Actions inevitably goes the same way as Travis (pay $$$ or no builds), > and I'm happy to hear that you have a permanent solution in mind. Please note that this covers only Arm architecture. Other architectures are not covered. > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to > >> > > check > > > >> > > and get back. > > > >> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > > >> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning > >> > > > is > > > >> > > > linked to my > > > >> > > account. > > > >> > Can you please provide a link to this? > > > >> > > > >> You can see here: > > > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests > > > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> David Marchand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-26 16:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-01-22 7:28 [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status Ruifeng Wang 2021-01-22 7:48 ` David Marchand 2021-01-22 8:05 ` Ruifeng Wang 2021-01-22 14:16 ` Aaron Conole 2021-01-22 14:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 2021-01-25 9:44 ` David Marchand 2021-01-26 13:56 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 2021-01-26 14:29 ` Aaron Conole 2021-01-26 16:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).