DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Lincoln Lavoie" <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Van Haaren Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	"Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [dpdklab] RE: rte_service unit test failing randomly
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:52:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58148E14E254673B6E4B7619985C9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D8739F@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

<snip>

> > >
> > > On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > >> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com]
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.51
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > >>> I have been wondering how accurate the tests really are. Where can
> > > I
> > > >> see what is being done to ensure that the EAL worker threads are
> > > fully
> > > >> isolated, and never interrupted by the O/S scheduler or similar?
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Back to the topic of unit testing, I think we need to consider their purpose and
> where we expect them to run.  Unit tests are run in automated environments,
> across multiple CI systems, i.e. UNH-IOL Community Lab, GitHub, etc.  Those
> environments are typically virtualized and I don't think the unit tests should
> require turning down to the level of CPU clock ticks.  Those tests are likely better
> suited to dedicated performance environments, where the complete host is
> tightly controlled, for the purpose of repeatable and deterministic results on
> things like packet throughput, etc.
> 
> Excellent point, Lincoln. Verifying the performance of the surrounding runtime
> environment - i.e. the host running the tests - is not unit test material, it belongs
> with the performance tests.
IIRC, the unit tests were separated into perf tests and non-perf tests. The perf tests were meant to be run on bare metal systems in the lab.

> 
> So, how do I add a test case to the performance test suite? Is there a guide, a
> reference example, or any other documentation I can look at for inspiration?
> 
> NB: This is a good example of yesterday's techboard meeting discussion... I'm a
> DTS newbie wanting to contribute with a new test case, how do I get started?
> 
> If no such documentation exists, could someone please point at a couple of files
> representing what needs to be added?
In the current DTS, you can look at some documentation at doc/dts_gsg/usr_guide/intro.rst and look at hello world test case. You can also look at tests/TestSuite_hello_world.py and test_plans/hello_world_test_plan.rst. 

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-05 19:14 David Marchand
2022-10-05 20:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 20:52   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 21:33     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06  6:53       ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06  7:04         ` David Marchand
2022-10-06  7:50           ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06  7:50         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06  8:18           ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06  8:59             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06  9:49               ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 11:07                 ` [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2022-10-06 12:00                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 17:52                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2022-10-06 13:51         ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58148E14E254673B6E4B7619985C9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=dts@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).