[dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Ruifeng Wang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 423 bytes --]

Hi Aaron,

Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?

It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds

I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm's communication with Travis.
DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
Just want to know if it works as expected.

Thanks.
Regards,
Ruifeng


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2717 bytes --]

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[David Marchand]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> wrote:
> Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
>
> It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
>
> I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s communication with Travis.
> DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.

Can you share details on this?
Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
What of other individual's forks?

>
> Just want to know if it works as expected.

From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for
DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is
linked to my account.


-- 
David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Ruifeng Wang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM
> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Cc: aconole@redhat.com; ci@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status
> 
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> wrote:
> > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
> >
> > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
> >
> > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s
> communication with Travis.
> > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
> 
> Can you share details on this?
> Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
> Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
> What of other individual's forks?

Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get back.
Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.

> 
> >
> > Just want to know if it works as expected.
> 
> From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for DPDK/dpdk and
> ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my account.
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Aaron Conole]

Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM
>> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
>> Cc: aconole@redhat.com; ci@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
>> >
>> > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
>> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
>> >
>> > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s
>> communication with Travis.
>> > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
>> 
>> Can you share details on this?
>> Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
>> Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
>> What of other individual's forks?
>
> Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get back.
> Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.

Looks like it hasn't.  And I see a message like:

   Builds have been temporarily disabled for public repositories due to a negative credit balance

So... there's that.

>> 
>> >
>> > Just want to know if it works as expected.
>> 
>> From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for DPDK/dpdk and
>> ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my account.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

<snip>

> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
> > >
> > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
> > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
> > >
> > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s
> > communication with Travis.
> > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
> >
> > Can you share details on this?
> > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk

> > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
This was not requested. Which one do we need?

> > What of other individual's forks?
I have not discussed this.
Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?

> 
> Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get
> back.
> Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Just want to know if it works as expected.
> >
> > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for
> > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my
> account.
Can you please provide a link to this?

> >
> >
> > --
> > David Marchand
> 

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[David Marchand]

Hello,

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
> > > >
> > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
> > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
> > > >
> > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s
> > > communication with Travis.
> > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
> > >
> > > Can you share details on this?
> > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
> It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk

I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on
push" option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk.
Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled
with "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.".
I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job
which got cancelled with the same message.

So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build,
no build on push).


> > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
> This was not requested. Which one do we need?

I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more
important (and the more credits-hungry btw).
DPDK/dpdk is a bonus.


> > > What of other individual's forks?
> I have not discussed this.
> Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?

I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis.
This is not required, but nice for contributors.


>
> >
> > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and get
> > back.
> > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Just want to know if it works as expected.
> > >
> > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for
> > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is linked to my
> > account.
> Can you please provide a link to this?

You can see here:
https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests
https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests


--
David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3488 bytes --]

<snip>

Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊



>

> Hello,

>

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli

> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>> wrote:

> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang

> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com<mailto:Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?

> > > > >

> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.

> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds

> > > > >

> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s

> > > > communication with Travis.

> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.

> > > >

> > > > Can you share details on this?

> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?

> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk

>

> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push"

> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk.

> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with

> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.".

> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got

> cancelled with the same message.

>

> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on

> push).

>

>

> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?

> > This was not requested. Which one do we need?

>

> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important

> (and the more credits-hungry btw).

> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus.

>

>

> > > > What of other individual's forks?

> > I have not discussed this.

> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?

>

> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis.

> This is not required, but nice for contributors.

I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this email to our team and see what they say.



We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution.



>

>

> >

> > >

> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check

> > > and get back.

> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.

> > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected.

> > > >

> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for

> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is

> > > > linked to my

> > > account.

> > Can you please provide a link to this?

>

> You can see here:

> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests

> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests

>

>

> --

> David Marchand



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8663 bytes --]

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Aaron Conole]

Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> writes:

> <snip>
>
> Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing things on the list 😊
>
>  
>
>> 
>
>> Hello,
>
>> 
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
>
>> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang
>
>> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
>
>> > > > wrote:
>
>> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabled?
>
>> > > > >
>
>> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
>
>> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
>
>> > > > >
>
>> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm’s
>
>> > > > communication with Travis.
>
>> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
>
>> > > >
>
>> > > > Can you share details on this?
>
>> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
>
>> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk
>
>> 
>
>> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push"
>
>> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk.
>
>> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with
>
>> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.".
>
>> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got
>
>> cancelled with the same message.
>
>> 
>
>> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on
>
>> push).
>
>> 
>
>> 
>
>> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
>
>> > This was not requested. Which one do we need?
>
>> 
>
>> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important
>
>> (and the more credits-hungry btw).
>
>> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus.
>
>> 
>
>> 
>
>> > > > What of other individual's forks?
>
>> > I have not discussed this.
>
>> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?
>
>> 
>
>> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis.
>
>> This is not required, but nice for contributors.
>
> I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and
> Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed
> to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this
> email to our team and see what they say.
>
>  
>
> We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It should happen in the next 3 months (there are
> other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see
> if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solution.

That's good to know.  We have been discussing internally what to do when
Github Actions inevitably goes the same way as Travis (pay $$$ or no
builds), and I'm happy to hear that you have a permanent solution in
mind.

>  
>
>> 
>
>> 
>
>> >
>
>> > >
>
>> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check
>
>> > > and get back.
>
>> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.
>
>> > >
>
>> > > >
>
>> > > > >
>
>> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected.
>
>> > > >
>
>> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for
>
>> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is
>
>> > > > linked to my
>
>> > > account.
>
>> > Can you please provide a link to this?
>
>> 
>
>> You can see here:
>
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests
>
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests
>
>> 
>
>> 
>
>> --
>
>> David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

<snip>

> 
> Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> writes:
> 
> > <snip>
> >
> > Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing
> > things on the list 😊
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Hello,
> >
> >>
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> >
> >> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang
> >
> >> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >
> >> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been
> disabled?
> >
> >> > > > >
> >
> >> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020.
> >
> >> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds
> >
> >> > > > >
> >
> >> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of
> >> > > > > Arm’s
> >
> >> > > > communication with Travis.
> >
> >> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue.
> >
> >> > > >
> >
> >> > > > Can you share details on this?
> >
> >> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits?
> >
> >> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk
> >
> >>
> >
> >> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on
> push"
> >
> >> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk.
> >
> >> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled
> >> with
> >
> >> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.".
> >
> >> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job
> >> which got
> >
> >> cancelled with the same message.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly
> >> build, no build on
> >
> >> push).
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both?
> >
> >> > This was not requested. Which one do we need?
> >
> >>
> >
> >> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more
> >> important
> >
> >> (and the more credits-hungry btw).
> >
> >> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> > > > What of other individual's forks?
> >
> >> > I have not discussed this.
> >
> >> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers?
> >
> >>
> >
> >> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis.
> >
> >> This is not required, but nice for contributors.
> >
> > I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been
> > happening between Arm Ecosystem development team and Travis. So, info
> > on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided the link to
> > DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed to be on the 'allow list' and being
> monitored by Travis Support to ensure that credits are getting topped off. I
> will pass this email to our team and see what they say.
> >
> >
> >
> > We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated.
> > It should happen in the next 3 months (there are other projects too
> > which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but I will change it to
> ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see if we can provide access to maintainers.
> This will be a permanent solution.
> 
> That's good to know.  We have been discussing internally what to do when
> Github Actions inevitably goes the same way as Travis (pay $$$ or no builds),
> and I'm happy to hear that you have a permanent solution in mind.
Please note that this covers only Arm architecture. Other architectures are not covered.

> 
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> >
> >
> >> > >
> >
> >> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to
> >> > > check
> >
> >> > > and get back.
> >
> >> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run.
> >
> >> > >
> >
> >> > > >
> >
> >> > > > >
> >
> >> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected.
> >
> >> > > >
> >
> >> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for
> >
> >> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning
> >> > > > is
> >
> >> > > > linked to my
> >
> >> > > account.
> >
> >> > Can you please provide a link to this?
> >
> >>
> >
> >> You can see here:
> >
> >> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests
> >
> >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> --
> >
> >> David Marchand