DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gao, DaxueX" <daxuex.gao@intel.com>
To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Huang, ChenyuX" <chenyux.huang@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Diagnosing CI Failures Question
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 01:02:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5799FF072D08D303733C1E079D869@MW4PR11MB5799.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wVEBmsHnevCOwYMZZ9y7vGc=SWqLhGO3t7ekB0CsgH6w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Tyler,
Reruns can only be triggered by the ci manager, Submitting a new patch will automatically start testing.
Check for issues from a base branch, such as the dpdk branch, In the future, consider sending the ci/intel-Functional test results of the corresponding branch to the community to facilitate troubleshooting.

Daxue Gao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: 2023年3月21日 18:11
> To: Huang, ChenyuX <chenyux.huang@intel.com>; Gao, DaxueX
> <daxuex.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>;
> Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: Diagnosing CI Failures Question
> 
> Hello guys,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:59 PM Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 04:27:24AM +0000, Huang, ChenyuX wrote:
> > > There is a problem with the ci machine and it has been repaired. No
> > > problem with the new report
> >
> > Is there a way to "re-run" existing patch sets through the
> > ci/intel-Functional tests? or is the only way to re-submit the same
> > series to dev@dpdk.org?
> >
> > Additionally, in the case of failures how do we extract artifacts for
> > diagnosis? for large tree-wide changes it's quite difficult to rely
> > entirely on code review to guess what caused a failure.
> 
> Can you reply to Tyler?
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand


      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230316165126.GB8277@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
2023-03-16 16:59 ` David Marchand
2023-03-17  4:27   ` Huang, ChenyuX
2023-03-17 14:59     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-21 10:10       ` David Marchand
2023-03-22  1:02         ` Gao, DaxueX [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5799FF072D08D303733C1E079D869@MW4PR11MB5799.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=daxuex.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenyux.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).