From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455D9A0A02 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:17:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409C6140D60; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:17:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E7C40147 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:17:25 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: ohK5Lj29BW2VzveKb82CdxS5yMb0kJvvRLyDAoFw8lztRfDLVDUFlJLF/M+ZH2sLAD+uibzQPY WiJX/ge/lTDw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9933"; a="190906340" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,277,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="190906340" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2021 01:17:22 -0700 IronPort-SDR: xpjZi6A84KrymeFoEVtkcFOZtffFQxBMiIw1+GhWn6RibLLtyS8u/j7Z6fcnu1rwCFtkFU29De I6egBSTcP3Fw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,277,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="442663572" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2021 01:17:22 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:17:22 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:17:20 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:17:20 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: Thomas Monjalon , Ali Alnubani , Aaron Conole CC: "ci@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects Thread-Index: AQHXFoYgirMZFqHqLEOnXmCvSTduKap+ar4AgAYoFACAD9SkUP//g0UAgACGqVA= Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:17:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <0bdc529461824da6943acc968fb41e3f@intel.com> <7927872.xfylkBsRoT@thomas> In-Reply-To: <7927872.xfylkBsRoT@thomas> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: 2021=1B$BG/=1B(B3=1B$B7n=1B(B25=1B$BF|=1B(B 16:15 > To: Ali Alnubani ; Aaron Conole ; > Tu, Lijuan > Cc: ci@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects >=20 > 25/03/2021 09:01, Tu, Lijuan: > > We sent reports to dts project, and it works, e.g. > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dts/patch/1615946979-23566-1-git-send- > > email-hailinx.xu@intel.com/ but we met another question, which mail > > address should dts reports send to ? > > If reports sent to < test-report@dpdk.org>, it will be mixed with dpdk > > reports, e.g. > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-March/183128.html > > And an tag [dpdk-test-report] will be added automatically, it's very co= nfused > for users. > > Therefore, Can we have a separated mail address for dts reports? >=20 > We need to check which change is required in patchwork processing to have > multiple test report mailing lists. > It may take a bit of time. Is it urgent? No, take your time, thanks