* [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments
[not found] <bug-122-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
@ 2018-12-11 20:34 ` bugzilla
2018-12-12 3:28 ` bugzilla
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2018-12-11 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ci
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Plsek (jplsek@iol.unh.edu) ---
I ran this manually, and it had passing results for me.
This is how I tested it (after stopping the CI from running on the node
temporarily):
In one terminal:
cd /root/test_harness/trex-core-2.26/scripts
./t-rex-64 -i --no-scapy-server --cfg ../../trex_cfg.yaml
In another terminal:
cd /root/test_harness/dts
./dts -s --snapshot /tmp/dpdktest2/dpdk.tar.gz # tarball with the patch applied
using commit b0aa225b45 as a baseline for the expected results from
conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg
Then looking at the output folder logs, it had similar results to the email.
How did you test this? What baseline did you use? How did you make the tarball
that was being tested?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments
[not found] <bug-122-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
2018-12-11 20:34 ` [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments bugzilla
@ 2018-12-12 3:28 ` bugzilla
2018-12-12 15:48 ` bugzilla
2020-04-21 13:47 ` bugzilla
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2018-12-12 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ci
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
--- Comment #2 from Lijuan Tu (lijuan.tu@intel.com) ---
The root cause is the argument "-s" which means skip the step of dpdk,
therefore it actually tested the default directory "/root/dpdk" but not the
patched dpdk: "/tmp/dpdktest2/dpdk.tar.gz"
Could you remove "-s" from the command line:
./dts --snapshot /tmp/dpdktest2/dpdk.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments
[not found] <bug-122-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
2018-12-11 20:34 ` [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments bugzilla
2018-12-12 3:28 ` bugzilla
@ 2018-12-12 15:48 ` bugzilla
2020-04-21 13:47 ` bugzilla
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2018-12-12 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ci
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Plsek (jplsek@iol.unh.edu) ---
Okay, I've removed the -s from the command line.
I'm assuming from the testing, patches 48697, 48699, 48703, 48704, 48706–48710,
are probably false failures. I'll be rerunning them throughout the day.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [dpdk-ci] [Bug 122] Performance results are not correct on Intel I40E environments
[not found] <bug-122-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-12-12 15:48 ` bugzilla
@ 2020-04-21 13:47 ` bugzilla
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2020-04-21 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ci
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
Thomas Monjalon (thomas@monjalon.net) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC| |thomas@monjalon.net
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Monjalon (thomas@monjalon.net) ---
Closed as invalid.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread