From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBB5A0540
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:17:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8C71AFB;
	Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:17:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (xvm-172-178.dc0.ghst.net [95.142.172.178])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61001023
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:17:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
 id EEFB8A0544; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:17:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: ci@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:17:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: lab
X-Bugzilla-Component: Intel Lab
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: kevuzaj@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ci@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-511-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dpdk-ci] [Bug 511] Add check if performance tests are needed
X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/>
List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "ci" <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D511

            Bug ID: 511
           Summary: Add check if performance tests are needed
           Product: lab
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: Normal
         Component: Intel Lab
          Assignee: ci@dpdk.org
          Reporter: kevuzaj@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

I submitted a patch for DPDK Unit Test [1], that only changed one file in
app/test/.

I noticed that UNH is running performance testing on these patches, when re=
ally
it is not required. It may also run performance testing when there is a cha=
nge
to a .rst only etc.

Sometimes it may be difficult to know if something will impact performance,=
 but
for these very obvious cases at least maybe some rule could be added so that
performance testing is not run.=20

Of course, it is not an issue in receiving the mails with the results, but
perhaps it would free up some lab resources, hence the suggestion.

[1]
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/74486/

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=