From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43DA43E45; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E26402A8; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736AE4029B for <ci@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:18:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1712845102; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wUSZFpcqVhyCJ9hEDu5L/9a/dwMXQkWqb12vBpHEoIU=; b=HJD0ANksLOOdhI50PrVh4Lvub8YLas4udn3eQUZGWL75empId3qxFZukqXBi4CNtDt73X8 gk/RU54Nodj3iKIYcnlE/v5yR5V35jMBh8AiNKVDYv4Fs3b3oe+NbNHpobdeTxNbkHtx1s dZL/2R7MDfmHTDM03X3oA4+KPWVrY70= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-115-NIOUD_sRP_C4AyT3r9e0Gg-1; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:18:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: NIOUD_sRP_C4AyT3r9e0Gg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143C9188731B; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.34.140]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A701DC13FB8; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:18:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>, Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>, ci@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Subject: Re: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork In-Reply-To: <4881077.GXAFRqVoOG@thomas> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:41:28 +0200") References: <CAC-YWqhFpn5zrZsJ_R6sUehH1FzSWpuRFpgQ-CRaG5p8NrHAbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJvnSUAi0SbZ_LRyX3R+i=RL4QBK0jQYJtrW2yHEQ+pLJ0ggxQ@mail.gmail.com> <4881077.GXAFRqVoOG@thomas> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: <f7t1q7c7zko.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/> List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes: > Hello, > > Yes I still think it is a valuable work to achieve. > If Aaron agrees, I wish you can complete this feature upstream. okay by me > Thank you > > > 04/04/2024 15:50, Patrick Robb: >> Hi Thomas, >>=20 >> Adam explains more completely in the preceding email, but he has >> talked with the patchwork project maintainer, and determined the >> needed next steps to do work adding depends-on support to patchwork >> server. And he provides an estimate (35-50 hours of his time) for >> adding this feature to pw. >>=20 >> What we want is a community opinion on using Community Lab resources >> (our developer time) towards this effort on patchwork project. I'm >> going to you, because you were the person who originally raised the >> depends on issue and adding this support to pw server. >>=20 >> Given his time estimate, do you endorse this work, or do you prefer we >> focus on our SOW items and other community requests which are in queue >> right now? Thanks. >>=20 >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:51=E2=80=AFPM Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.e= du> wrote: >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > There has been a discussion on GitHub between myself and others about >> > adding support for series dependency to Patchwork. This would involve >> > adding the feature to the Patchwork dashboard and git-pw. However, it >> > seems like the maintainer would like us to do much of the required >> > implementation work. I estimate, with a low level of certainty, that >> > it would consume 35 to 50 hours of developer time. >> > >> > The active issue relating to this feature can be found here, as well >> > as the archived one: >> > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/583 >> > >> > Would it be worth it for us here at the Community Lab to contribute >> > upstream to Patchwork? Implementing the feature in the Patchwork >> > project will make our method for defining series dependencies the >> > standard, and it may lift some of the burden of maintaining this >> > feature off of us. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Adam Hassick >>=20