From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7EBA04B8 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:15:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659EA1D5B5; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:15:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DFB1C22A for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588688137; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4Mty+3aHU2Bphcc40iUeN9uT4wwTQm7ivWZNSfN3jY=; b=gm9Do6po7DP7qlIXQibECG+dfyxX8rbcqO+62BnGjFpNR4JFA0/jEPnRWz23kswA5y2bn7 bXdYOiQOChsGuv2zLlyHyGTh4HcP4gkIw/2NWMUMnBHv4eesg3/hgR4eY+iifn0LojDCrN x5H1ymDIhJp+V2YhAu+aAx4xcER0FBc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-77-CSjJWaihOP2EoFrnAgDb6g-1; Tue, 05 May 2020 10:15:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CSjJWaihOP2EoFrnAgDb6g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B59460; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-3.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6158D5D9DA; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:15:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: David Christensen , David Wilder Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 10:15:31 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [dpdk-ci] [DISCUSS] DPDK PPC testing / CI X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hello David(s), I know you are keen on having PPC support in the DPDK CI. Right now, we're seeing serious reliability problems with Travis for the ARM support (and even Intel has been slightly misbehaving). We're not sure whether the same issues exist under PPC. How extensive have you tested with the PPC series and support under Travis CI? Just starting the conversation right now. -Aaron