From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA12FA052A for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:29:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A85140EE9; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:29:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE308140EE6 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:29:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611671393; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UXk60Zr+DUSPW9/uaWSKQDttESuXKVEOF8HSTD4ngtI=; b=a18HA79lJNiiktsm6BoWaLE+xPLthmz8PGTQ4Myr8BauBPC85UyRBoF6ayi8EyIO810BUQ Vruaob16KUHRnMf09w3RLAgRMoXCLrzg0+rAbTxHw/u4p4ksHlF20DuVBuRU0a7lv+Ox5U nKnL7qsgDBgxr91r+S61l65c1ZT9UEE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-544-_PeClwD_PFO9KZK59orc3A-1; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:29:49 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _PeClwD_PFO9KZK59orc3A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA17190A7A0; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-243.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D4B5D751; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:29:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: David Marchand , "thomas\@monjalon.net" , "Yigit\, Ferruh" , Ruifeng Wang , "ci\@dpdk.org" , nd References: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:29:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Honnappa Nagarahalli's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:56:07 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Honnappa Nagarahalli writes: > > > Thanks for keeping this off the list, I was not comfortable discussing th= ings on the list =F0=9F=98=8A > > =20 > >>=20 > >> Hello, > >>=20 > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > >> wrote: > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been dis= abled? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > >> > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm= =E2=80=99s > >> > > > communication with Travis. > >> > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > >> > > > > >> > > > Can you share details on this? > >> > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > >> > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk > >>=20 > >> I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on p= ush" > >> option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. > >> Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled wi= th > >> "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". > >> I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job whic= h got > >> cancelled with the same message. > >>=20 > >> So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, n= o build on > >> push). > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > >> > This was not requested. Which one do we need? > >>=20 > >> I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more impo= rtant > >> (and the more credits-hungry btw). > >> DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> > > > What of other individual's forks? > >> > I have not discussed this. > >> > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? > >>=20 > >> I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. > >> This is not required, but nice for contributors. > > I definitely agree, this is good to have. The discussion has been happeni= ng between Arm Ecosystem development team and > Travis. So, info on how things are implemented is scarce. I had provided = the link to DPDK/dpdk github and it was supposed > to be on the 'allow list' and being monitored by Travis Support to ensure= that credits are getting topped off. I will pass this > email to our team and see what they say. > > =20 > > We are also working on getting Arm owned GitLab instance integrated. It s= hould happen in the next 3 months (there are > other projects too which are affected). I had planned for DPDK/dpdk, but = I will change it to ovsrobot/dpdk. I will check to see > if we can provide access to maintainers. This will be a permanent solutio= n. That's good to know. We have been discussing internally what to do when Github Actions inevitably goes the same way as Travis (pay $$$ or no builds), and I'm happy to hear that you have a permanent solution in mind. > =20 > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check > >> > > and get back. > >> > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > >> > > > > >> > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > >> > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is > >> > > > linked to my > >> > > account. > >> > Can you please provide a link to this? > >>=20 > >> You can see here: > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> -- > >> David Marchand