From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF06A0A02 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:38:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCE0141384; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:38:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF52141383 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:38:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610638709; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5JhpSYa1FrPJAPgXhD3QKcM+zUO4+8YKqLS6t9fOAuw=; b=K+laCIuDZs/COrDlIZQfo5KUAwMATNmz2TnsoqhP2ZK3i8i6jeTGScV/c4SiqtXnuhHR5D yoLUxZXW9WnTJ1h88UkvCUdvWLsa4Gpa91oqBUAcbruhLhTpb87DBSfco4nrRuVmXNn0AP ZKlbkH923bmsmtwWC9Z7Q3kPOEZOVX8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-289-yT1CacxrPlWv3X_3fgt27g-1; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:38:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yT1CacxrPlWv3X_3fgt27g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2190B15720; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-113-60.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.113.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43DF019C48; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: "Jiang\, Cheng1" Cc: "ci\@dpdk.org" , "Xia\, Chenbo" , "Hu\, Jiayu" , "Yang\, YvonneX" References: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:38:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Cheng1 Jiang's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2021 02:23:42 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" "Jiang, Cheng1" writes: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot. > This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in = my environment. > It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be > applied, then how could this happened? Really strange. I guess that's probably what happened here. The DPDK 0-day robot has difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against. Nothing 'wrong' here on your side. I will look at this closer and see if I can get it working better. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Aaron Conole >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check >>=20 >> "Jiang, Cheng1" writes: >>=20 >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > I=E2=80=99m an engineer from DPDK project. >> > >> > I=E2=80=99ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has n= ot made >> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a probl= em. >>=20 >> From the 0day robot, I see the following error: >>=20 >> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c). >> error: could not build fake ancestor >> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch >> Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path >> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". >> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. >> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort"= . >>=20 >> So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on? >>=20 >> > Here is the link: >> > >> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/ >> > >> > >> > >> > Looking forward to your reply. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Cheng