[PATCH v2 0/1] tools: Add script for getting rerun requests

[PATCH v2 0/1] tools: Add script for getting rerun requests

[jspewock]

From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>

This version addresses comments of the previous and allows users to send
output to stdout.

v1: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2023-September/002562.html

Jeremy Spewock (1):
  tools: add get_reruns script

 tools/get_reruns.py | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 218 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/get_reruns.py

-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v2 1/1] tools: add get_reruns script

[jspewock]

From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>

This script is used to interact with the DPDK Patchwork API to collect a
list of retests from comments on patches based on a desired list of
contexts to retest. The script uses regex to scan all of the comments
since a timestamp that is passed into the script through the CLI for
any comment that is requesting a retest. These requests are then filtered
based on the desired contexts that you pass into the script through the
CLI and then aggregated based on the patch series ID of the series that
the comment came from. This aggregated list is then outputted either to
a JSON file or stdout with a timestamp of the most recent comment on
patchworks.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
Signed-off-by: Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>
---
 tools/get_reruns.py | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 218 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/get_reruns.py

diff --git a/tools/get_reruns.py b/tools/get_reruns.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..832da62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/get_reruns.py
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+# Copyright(c) 2023 University of New Hampshire
+
+import argparse
+import datetime
+import json
+import re
+import requests
+from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Set
+
+PATCHWORK_EVENTS_API_URL = "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/events/"
+
+
+class JSONSetEncoder(json.JSONEncoder):
+    """Custom JSON encoder to handle sets.
+
+    Pythons json module cannot serialize sets so this custom encoder converts
+    them into lists.
+    """
+
+    def default(self, input_object):
+        if isinstance(input_object, set):
+            return list(input_object)
+        return input_object
+
+
+class RerunProcessor:
+    """Class for finding reruns inside an email using the patchworks events
+    API.
+
+    The idea of this class is to use regex to find certain patterns that
+    represent desired contexts to rerun.
+
+    Arguments:
+        desired_contexts: List of all contexts to search for in the bodies of
+            the comments
+        time_since: Get all comments since this timestamp
+
+    Attributes:
+        collection_of_retests: A dictionary that maps patch series IDs to the
+            set of contexts to be retested for that patch series.
+        regex: regex used for collecting the contexts from the comment body.
+        last_comment_timestamp: timestamp of the most recent comment that was
+            processed
+    """
+
+    _desired_contexts: List[str]
+    _time_since: str
+    collection_of_retests: Dict[str, Dict[str, Set]] = {}
+    last_comment_timestamp: Optional[str] = None
+    # The tag we search for in comments must appear at the start of the line
+    # and is case sensitive. After this tag we expect a comma separated list
+    # of valid DPDK patchwork contexts.
+    #
+    # VALID MATCHES:
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing, iol-something-else, iol-one-more,
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,iol-something-else, iol-one-more
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing, iol-example, iol-another-example,
+    #   more-intel-testing
+    # INVALID MATCHES:
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,  intel-example-testing
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing iol-something-else,iol-one-more,
+    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,iol-something-else,iol-one-more,
+    #
+    #   more-intel-testing
+    regex: str = "^Recheck-request: ((?:[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+(?:, ?\n?)?)+)"
+
+    def __init__(self, desired_contexts: List[str], time_since: str) -> None:
+        self._desired_contexts = desired_contexts
+        self._time_since = time_since
+
+    def process_reruns(self) -> None:
+        patchwork_url = f"{PATCHWORK_EVENTS_API_URL}?since={self._time_since}"
+        comment_request_info = []
+        for item in [
+            "&category=cover-comment-created",
+            "&category=patch-comment-created",
+        ]:
+            response = requests.get(patchwork_url + item)
+            response.raise_for_status()
+            comment_request_info.extend(response.json())
+        rerun_processor.process_comment_info(comment_request_info)
+
+    def process_comment_info(self, list_of_comment_blobs: List[Dict]) -> None:
+        """Takes the list of json blobs of comment information and associates
+        them with their patches.
+
+        Collects retest labels from a list of comments on patches represented
+        inlist_of_comment_blobs and creates a dictionary that associates them
+        with their corresponding patch series ID. The labels that need to be
+        retested are collected by passing the comments body into
+        get_test_names() method. This method also updates the current UTC
+        timestamp for the processor to the current time.
+
+        Args:
+            list_of_comment_blobs: a list of JSON blobs that represent comment
+            information
+        """
+
+        list_of_comment_blobs = sorted(
+            list_of_comment_blobs,
+            key=lambda x: datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(x["date"]),
+            reverse=True,
+        )
+
+        if list_of_comment_blobs:
+            most_recent_timestamp = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(
+                list_of_comment_blobs[0]["date"]
+            )
+            # exclude the most recent
+            most_recent_timestamp = most_recent_timestamp + datetime.timedelta(
+                microseconds=1
+            )
+            self.last_comment_timestamp = most_recent_timestamp.isoformat()
+
+        for comment in list_of_comment_blobs:
+            # before we do any parsing we want to make sure that we are dealing
+            # with a comment that is associated with a patch series
+            payload_key = "cover"
+            if comment["category"] == "patch-comment-created":
+                payload_key = "patch"
+            patch_series_arr = requests.get(
+                comment["payload"][payload_key]["url"]
+            ).json()["series"]
+            if not patch_series_arr:
+                continue
+            patch_id = patch_series_arr[0]["id"]
+
+            comment_info = requests.get(comment["payload"]["comment"]["url"])
+            comment_info.raise_for_status()
+            content = comment_info.json()["content"]
+
+            labels_to_rerun = self.get_test_names(content)
+
+            # appending to the list if it already exists, or creating it if it
+            # doesn't
+            if labels_to_rerun:
+                self.collection_of_retests[patch_id] = self.collection_of_retests.get(
+                    patch_id, {"contexts": set()}
+                )
+                self.collection_of_retests[patch_id]["contexts"].update(labels_to_rerun)
+
+    def get_test_names(self, email_body: str) -> Set[str]:
+        """Uses the regex in the class to get the information from the email.
+
+        When it gets the test names from the email, it will all be in one
+        capture group. We expect a comma separated list of patchwork labels
+        to be retested.
+
+        Returns:
+            A set of contexts found in the email that match your list of
+            desired contexts to capture. We use a set here to avoid duplicate
+            contexts.
+        """
+        rerun_section = re.findall(self.regex, email_body, re.MULTILINE)
+        if not rerun_section:
+            return set()
+        rerun_list = list(map(str.strip, rerun_section[0].split(",")))
+        return set(filter(lambda x: x and x in self._desired_contexts, rerun_list))
+
+    def write_output(self, file_name: str) -> None:
+        """Output class information.
+
+        Takes the collection_of_retests and last_comment_timestamp and outputs
+        them into either a json file or stdout.
+
+        Args:
+            file_name: Name of the file to write the output to. If this is set
+            to "-" then it will output to stdout.
+        """
+
+        output_dict = {
+            "retests": self.collection_of_retests,
+            "last_comment_timestamp": self.last_comment_timestamp,
+        }
+        if file_name == "-":
+            print(json.dumps(output_dict, indent=4, cls=JSONSetEncoder))
+        else:
+            with open(file_name, "w") as file:
+                file.write(json.dumps(output_dict, indent=4, cls=JSONSetEncoder))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Help text for getting reruns")
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "-ts",
+        "--time-since",
+        dest="time_since",
+        required=True,
+        help='Get all patches since this timestamp (yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.SSSSSS).',
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--contexts",
+        dest="contexts_to_capture",
+        nargs="*",
+        required=True,
+        help='List of patchwork contexts you would like to capture.',
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "-o",
+        "--out-file",
+        dest="out_file",
+        help=(
+            'Output file where the list of reruns and the timestamp of the'
+            'last comment in the list of comments is sent. If this is set'
+            'to "-" then it will output to stdout (default: -).'
+        ),
+        default="-",
+    )
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+    rerun_processor = RerunProcessor(args.contexts_to_capture, args.time_since)
+    rerun_processor.process_reruns()
+    rerun_processor.write_output(args.out_file)
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tools: add get_reruns script

[Aaron Conole]

jspewock@iol.unh.edu writes:

> From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
>
> This script is used to interact with the DPDK Patchwork API to collect a
> list of retests from comments on patches based on a desired list of
> contexts to retest. The script uses regex to scan all of the comments
> since a timestamp that is passed into the script through the CLI for
> any comment that is requesting a retest. These requests are then filtered
> based on the desired contexts that you pass into the script through the
> CLI and then aggregated based on the patch series ID of the series that
> the comment came from. This aggregated list is then outputted either to
> a JSON file or stdout with a timestamp of the most recent comment on
> patchworks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>
> ---

Thanks Jeremy - I'll take a look this week.  Just returning from PTO.

>  tools/get_reruns.py | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 218 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tools/get_reruns.py
>
> diff --git a/tools/get_reruns.py b/tools/get_reruns.py
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..832da62
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/get_reruns.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env python3
> +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +# Copyright(c) 2023 University of New Hampshire
> +
> +import argparse
> +import datetime
> +import json
> +import re
> +import requests
> +from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Set
> +
> +PATCHWORK_EVENTS_API_URL = "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/events/"
> +
> +
> +class JSONSetEncoder(json.JSONEncoder):
> +    """Custom JSON encoder to handle sets.
> +
> +    Pythons json module cannot serialize sets so this custom encoder converts
> +    them into lists.
> +    """
> +
> +    def default(self, input_object):
> +        if isinstance(input_object, set):
> +            return list(input_object)
> +        return input_object
> +
> +
> +class RerunProcessor:
> +    """Class for finding reruns inside an email using the patchworks events
> +    API.
> +
> +    The idea of this class is to use regex to find certain patterns that
> +    represent desired contexts to rerun.
> +
> +    Arguments:
> +        desired_contexts: List of all contexts to search for in the bodies of
> +            the comments
> +        time_since: Get all comments since this timestamp
> +
> +    Attributes:
> +        collection_of_retests: A dictionary that maps patch series IDs to the
> +            set of contexts to be retested for that patch series.
> +        regex: regex used for collecting the contexts from the comment body.
> +        last_comment_timestamp: timestamp of the most recent comment that was
> +            processed
> +    """
> +
> +    _desired_contexts: List[str]
> +    _time_since: str
> +    collection_of_retests: Dict[str, Dict[str, Set]] = {}
> +    last_comment_timestamp: Optional[str] = None
> +    # The tag we search for in comments must appear at the start of the line
> +    # and is case sensitive. After this tag we expect a comma separated list
> +    # of valid DPDK patchwork contexts.
> +    #
> +    # VALID MATCHES:
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing, iol-something-else, iol-one-more,
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,iol-something-else, iol-one-more
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing, iol-example, iol-another-example,
> +    #   more-intel-testing
> +    # INVALID MATCHES:
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,  intel-example-testing
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing iol-something-else,iol-one-more,
> +    #   Recheck-request: iol-unit-testing,iol-something-else,iol-one-more,
> +    #
> +    #   more-intel-testing
> +    regex: str = "^Recheck-request: ((?:[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+(?:, ?\n?)?)+)"
> +
> +    def __init__(self, desired_contexts: List[str], time_since: str) -> None:
> +        self._desired_contexts = desired_contexts
> +        self._time_since = time_since
> +
> +    def process_reruns(self) -> None:
> +        patchwork_url = f"{PATCHWORK_EVENTS_API_URL}?since={self._time_since}"
> +        comment_request_info = []
> +        for item in [
> +            "&category=cover-comment-created",
> +            "&category=patch-comment-created",
> +        ]:
> +            response = requests.get(patchwork_url + item)
> +            response.raise_for_status()
> +            comment_request_info.extend(response.json())
> +        rerun_processor.process_comment_info(comment_request_info)
> +
> +    def process_comment_info(self, list_of_comment_blobs: List[Dict]) -> None:
> +        """Takes the list of json blobs of comment information and associates
> +        them with their patches.
> +
> +        Collects retest labels from a list of comments on patches represented
> +        inlist_of_comment_blobs and creates a dictionary that associates them
> +        with their corresponding patch series ID. The labels that need to be
> +        retested are collected by passing the comments body into
> +        get_test_names() method. This method also updates the current UTC
> +        timestamp for the processor to the current time.
> +
> +        Args:
> +            list_of_comment_blobs: a list of JSON blobs that represent comment
> +            information
> +        """
> +
> +        list_of_comment_blobs = sorted(
> +            list_of_comment_blobs,
> +            key=lambda x: datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(x["date"]),
> +            reverse=True,
> +        )
> +
> +        if list_of_comment_blobs:
> +            most_recent_timestamp = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(
> +                list_of_comment_blobs[0]["date"]
> +            )
> +            # exclude the most recent
> +            most_recent_timestamp = most_recent_timestamp + datetime.timedelta(
> +                microseconds=1
> +            )
> +            self.last_comment_timestamp = most_recent_timestamp.isoformat()
> +
> +        for comment in list_of_comment_blobs:
> +            # before we do any parsing we want to make sure that we are dealing
> +            # with a comment that is associated with a patch series
> +            payload_key = "cover"
> +            if comment["category"] == "patch-comment-created":
> +                payload_key = "patch"
> +            patch_series_arr = requests.get(
> +                comment["payload"][payload_key]["url"]
> +            ).json()["series"]
> +            if not patch_series_arr:
> +                continue
> +            patch_id = patch_series_arr[0]["id"]
> +
> +            comment_info = requests.get(comment["payload"]["comment"]["url"])
> +            comment_info.raise_for_status()
> +            content = comment_info.json()["content"]
> +
> +            labels_to_rerun = self.get_test_names(content)
> +
> +            # appending to the list if it already exists, or creating it if it
> +            # doesn't
> +            if labels_to_rerun:
> +                self.collection_of_retests[patch_id] = self.collection_of_retests.get(
> +                    patch_id, {"contexts": set()}
> +                )
> +                self.collection_of_retests[patch_id]["contexts"].update(labels_to_rerun)
> +
> +    def get_test_names(self, email_body: str) -> Set[str]:
> +        """Uses the regex in the class to get the information from the email.
> +
> +        When it gets the test names from the email, it will all be in one
> +        capture group. We expect a comma separated list of patchwork labels
> +        to be retested.
> +
> +        Returns:
> +            A set of contexts found in the email that match your list of
> +            desired contexts to capture. We use a set here to avoid duplicate
> +            contexts.
> +        """
> +        rerun_section = re.findall(self.regex, email_body, re.MULTILINE)
> +        if not rerun_section:
> +            return set()
> +        rerun_list = list(map(str.strip, rerun_section[0].split(",")))
> +        return set(filter(lambda x: x and x in self._desired_contexts, rerun_list))
> +
> +    def write_output(self, file_name: str) -> None:
> +        """Output class information.
> +
> +        Takes the collection_of_retests and last_comment_timestamp and outputs
> +        them into either a json file or stdout.
> +
> +        Args:
> +            file_name: Name of the file to write the output to. If this is set
> +            to "-" then it will output to stdout.
> +        """
> +
> +        output_dict = {
> +            "retests": self.collection_of_retests,
> +            "last_comment_timestamp": self.last_comment_timestamp,
> +        }
> +        if file_name == "-":
> +            print(json.dumps(output_dict, indent=4, cls=JSONSetEncoder))
> +        else:
> +            with open(file_name, "w") as file:
> +                file.write(json.dumps(output_dict, indent=4, cls=JSONSetEncoder))
> +
> +
> +if __name__ == "__main__":
> +    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Help text for getting reruns")
> +    parser.add_argument(
> +        "-ts",
> +        "--time-since",
> +        dest="time_since",
> +        required=True,
> +        help='Get all patches since this timestamp (yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.SSSSSS).',
> +    )
> +    parser.add_argument(
> +        "--contexts",
> +        dest="contexts_to_capture",
> +        nargs="*",
> +        required=True,
> +        help='List of patchwork contexts you would like to capture.',
> +    )
> +    parser.add_argument(
> +        "-o",
> +        "--out-file",
> +        dest="out_file",
> +        help=(
> +            'Output file where the list of reruns and the timestamp of the'
> +            'last comment in the list of comments is sent. If this is set'
> +            'to "-" then it will output to stdout (default: -).'
> +        ),
> +        default="-",
> +    )
> +    args = parser.parse_args()
> +    rerun_processor = RerunProcessor(args.contexts_to_capture, args.time_since)
> +    rerun_processor.process_reruns()
> +    rerun_processor.write_output(args.out_file)

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tools: add get_reruns script

[Jeremy Spewock]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1430 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:06 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:

> jspewock@iol.unh.edu writes:
>
> > From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
> >
> > This script is used to interact with the DPDK Patchwork API to collect a
> > list of retests from comments on patches based on a desired list of
> > contexts to retest. The script uses regex to scan all of the comments
> > since a timestamp that is passed into the script through the CLI for
> > any comment that is requesting a retest. These requests are then filtered
> > based on the desired contexts that you pass into the script through the
> > CLI and then aggregated based on the patch series ID of the series that
> > the comment came from. This aggregated list is then outputted either to
> > a JSON file or stdout with a timestamp of the most recent comment on
> > patchworks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>
> > ---
>
> Thanks Jeremy - I'll take a look this week.  Just returning from PTO.
>
>
I actually submitted another version where you can pass in a patchworks API
URL with command-line args as well as I heard that might be useful. See v3
here:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/ci/patch/20230921195637.11369-4-jspewock@iol.unh.edu/

I think I forgot to mark these other ones as outdated on patchwork, I'll be
sure to do that now.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2453 bytes --]