From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B2FA04B5 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65011140D24; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14638140D1B for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610547107; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Cs4dP7oh1/EJS70X4oRqIAJWNUU9vlMl3ix/lG6Xn58=; b=LMvWfSH9Y5MFgSwGXnTRbI8cPUpvrPQyrAAmDjx0ukm53oFOL8IsuEtiE9m8qITLrgRkPg zuojMTZu+k3d2KUiYhHkDFtVZVwdrwHXJhM8pPyyRPE5UqfxmAM38cQW7+MkGNnpu1jsm9 ztm8g+rYbM4xrGmoXLe74gPujA0BCbQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-223-JrBOdXuzMyyhYGOEHdfbbA-1; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:11:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: JrBOdXuzMyyhYGOEHdfbbA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8B38066E1; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-113-60.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.113.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3386660D09; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: "Jiang\, Cheng1" Cc: "ci\@dpdk.org" , "Xia\, Chenbo" References: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:11:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Cheng1 Jiang's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:26:59 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" "Jiang, Cheng1" writes: > Hi, > > =20 > > I=E2=80=99m an engineer from DPDK project. > > I=E2=80=99ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not = made any progress for more than a day, so I > want to ask if there is a problem. >From the 0day robot, I see the following error: error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c). error: could not build fake ancestor hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on? > Here is the link: > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/ > > =20 > > Looking forward to your reply. > > Thanks. > > Cheng