Re: [dpdk-ci] OBS pull request in pw-ci

[Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>]

Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> writes:

> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:
>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> Have you had a chance to look at the pull request?
>
> Only a bit.  I will do something more thorough on Wednesday.

I looked through it and it seems okay.  I'll set it up to do a test run
tomorrow, and merge it once that goes well.

If the obs source project changes (right now, it's set to
home:bluca:dpdk) how should we update it?  Meaning, where does that
variable come from (and if the robot needs to provide one at some point
ever, how can we do that)?

>> Thanks,
>> Juraj
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 7:32 PM
>>> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
>>> Cc: ci@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: Re: OBS pull request in pw-ci
>>> 
>>> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:
>>> 
>>> > Hi folks,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I've submitted a PR with OBS changes to pw-ci:
>>> > https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-ci/pull/12
>>> 
>>> Cool!  I'll take a look.  I was on PTO, so didn't get a chance yet.
>>> 
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have a couple of points/questions:
>>> >
>>> > ·        The scripts are using
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bluca:dpdk/dpdk to fork the
>>> debian and
>>> > redhat spec and control files.
>>> 
>>> Okay.  A quick look shows that it's configurable, though.  Should be okay.  I refer
>>> to:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-
>>> ci/pull/12/commits/93f6baa497c85d7aca36cda6661e90f7a69d4709#diff-
>>> e2ab32f32889186bdeb0ab4f0ef55282
>>> 
>>> > ·        We should create a community OBS project (that the community can
>>> manage) where the forked packages will be
>>> > created and where the build will run (OBS_TARGET_PROJECT in
>>> > 3rd-party/dpdk/jenkins-rc)
>>> 
>>> Okay.
>>> 
>>> > o   The project should be configured according to what we want to build -
>>> distros/architectures. Can be done via OBS GUI.
>>> >
>>> > ·        Only after all patches have been submitted to a series branch does the
>>> DPDK Jenkins job upload and configure an OBS
>>> > package. This means that we'll have a build just for the whole series, not for
>>> each patch. Not sure if this is a problem.
>>> 
>>> The flip side is the amount of time to build.  We'd prefer to build just one at a
>>> time.
>>> 
>>> > ·        One thing that doesn't make sense to me is that the DPDK Jenkins job
>>> builds dpdk after each patch - is this needed,
>>> > since Travis is going to do the same thing anyway?
>>> 
>>> Travis doesn't.  The ovsrobot travis build is configured to cancel a build on a
>>> branch if a new one comes.  That way we only build the latest.  Builds on travis
>>> take 40+ min to complete, so if a 20-patch series came in, we wouldn't be done
>>> building it for more than half a day.  Then if a v2+ is posted in rapid succession,
>>> we lost all this time.  So for now, we only build the absolute last patch in the
>>> series on Travis.
>>> 
>>> Also, the build server we run the robot on doesn't do the builds anymore
>>> because it also got overloaded - so meson and ninja are not the actual
>>> meson/ninja but just dummy commands.  :-/  Maybe I should re-enable and see
>>> if things improved.
>>> 
>>> > ·        I've added some more comments to the PR itself.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Juraj
>>>