From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD4AA034C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:22:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70F3427F1; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:22:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFAD4069F for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:22:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1655911368; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wJDY8bK9JYwTXzO/A72IF1h98iRxw/Af8PGdAChfofo=; b=SHesCt1kwwYHmiUN8Oh9i0nU6u/v9J/oVUXUGPSPHGZgje3cmVnfTIkB98PwlN/O1x4d0W yTvK9rAj44z856V7IpK3nccnhhSXLK/uVQEv0Gmn/qvmGthrHMCkyLHko2pM+uZxd5RHpM 2NMVbZwMebLFqQUJgNxwKTAh9uifmF8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-628---urH0IiNN-DvULmghYFSA-1; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:22:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: --urH0IiNN-DvULmghYFSA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DC1101E9B0; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (unknown [10.22.33.64]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890DA1121314; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:22:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: "Kundapura, Ganapati" Cc: Adam Hassick , "dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu" , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "test-report@dpdk.org" , "Jayatheerthan, Jay" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , ci@dpdk.org Subject: Re: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: update instance get API References: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:22:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ganapati Kundapura's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:00:28 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Greeting Ganapati, "Kundapura, Ganapati" writes: > Hi Brandon, Brandon left the lab in April. I've CC'd Adam Hassick, who I think can probably help. > This patch is reporting apply warnings > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/22745/ > >=20=20 > > Test-Label: iol-testing > > Test-Status: WARNING > > http://dpdk.org/patch/113233 > >=20=20 > > _apply patch failure_ Looks like there was a race with updating vs. submitting. Agree - this should be rerun. > Submitter: Ganapati Kundapura > > Date: Wednesday, June 22 2022 10:37:56=20 > > Applied on: CommitID:9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082 > > Apply patch set 113233-113239 failed: > > But it seems that it=E2=80=99s trying to apply on the wrong commit=20 > > Applied on dpdk (9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082) > >=20=20 > > I=E2=80=99m able to apply it on the latest commits of dpdk and dpdk-next-= eventdev. > Thanks for confirming that at least this can apply and execute on 3227bc7138f5afd7593c0eb4dd6b52710f4193b7 ("crypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb f= or partial hash and AES") > Most probably the next-eventdev tree is off sync in the lab, can you plea= se check it? > > And after the issue is resolved, can you please re-trigger the test for m= entioned patch? I think this should be doable. > Thanks, > > Ganapati