From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061D6A0032 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:33:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E929540141; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:33:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164E440040 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:33:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637073224; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UXqcPgO/9Z28j8If2DTrLqhR1IhQx45JlxvwHuPwJ0c=; b=WHefpIuj41KX9Cedn53jO7lg/sp593+N4v8C4WXnPmkLF+Jh668e38r9FBwNtRAt1IHigC Kmoyj1Uff2uX0BYnczv9Cpc1oOlMhp8ZdynGuB0V1tr9PpCMzAponnMfMRyGwF7mlNXZOW 6t/zit9TZPzvXKxs9FYCLOyzA91e9tc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-598-1ZrjgCZUM0m_3avhAvNmjA-1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:33:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1ZrjgCZUM0m_3avhAvNmjA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F22357037; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (unknown [10.22.9.182]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA239197FC; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:33:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , ci@dpdk.org Subject: Re: spell check References: <1756614.3rAJA5Eeto@thomas> <6042854.nMU7bvWPEF@thomas> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:33:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6042854.nMU7bvWPEF@thomas> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:51:10 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Thomas Monjalon writes: > 16/11/2021 14:46, Lincoln Lavoie: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> This has been disabled in the lab. I think it should be possible to get >> to a base state where there aren't errors, it just requires getting past >> all of the acronyms and other "strange" (to a spell checker's prospective) >> parts of the documentation, like function names / prototypes, etc. > > There will be always new exceptions. > It looks more worry than benefit. > >> Part of the idea behind putting the spell checker scripts, and more >> importantly the dictionary and exceptions, into the devtools would be to >> allow the community to manage that list of exceptions, etc. > > I'm not sure it's good to add this requirement on contributors. > > Anyway that's a topic for techboard meeting. I'll make sure to ask about it. >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:54 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > After some thoughts, I think it is not reasonable to check spelling >> > in the CI, because we will always have false positives. >> > >> > Please could we disable "ci/iol-spell-check-testing" to avoid warnings?