DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] igc: fix invalid length and corrupted multi-segment mbufs
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:57:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f78eba-8eff-4c67-8ecf-3bef5f25b9f6@allegro-packets.com> (raw)


The issue only appeared with hardware-timestamping enabled
(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP).

The length of the prepended hardware timestamp was not subtracted from
the data length so that received packets were 16 bytes longer than
expected.

In scatter-gather mode only the first mbuf has a timestamp but the
data offset of the follow-up mbufs was not adjusted accordingly.
This caused 16 bytes of packet data to be missing between
the segments.

Signed-off-by: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
---
v2:
* Added comments for clarification.


 drivers/net/igc/igc_txrx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/igc/igc_txrx.c b/drivers/net/igc/igc_txrx.c
index d0cee1b016..fabab5b1a3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/igc/igc_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/igc/igc_txrx.c
@@ -347,6 +347,13 @@ igc_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 
 		rxm->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
 		data_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length) - rxq->crc_len;
+		/*
+		 * When the RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP offload is enabled the
+		 * length in the descriptor still accounts for the timestamp so
+		 * it must be subtracted.
+		 */
+		if (rxq->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP)
+			data_len -= IGC_TS_HDR_LEN;
 		rxm->data_len = data_len;
 		rxm->pkt_len = data_len;
 		rxm->nb_segs = 1;
@@ -509,6 +516,24 @@ igc_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 		 */
 		rxm->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
 		data_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.upper.length);
+		if (rxq->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP) {
+			/*
+			 * When the RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP offload is enabled
+			 * the pkt_addr of all software ring entries is moved forward
+			 * by IGC_TS_HDR_LEN (see igc_alloc_rx_queue_mbufs()) so that
+			 * when the hardware writes the packet with a prepended
+			 * timestamp the actual packet data still starts at the
+			 * normal data offset. The length in the descriptor still
+			 * accounts for the timestamp so it needs to be subtracted.
+			 * Follow-up mbufs do not have the timestamp so the data
+			 * offset must be adjusted to point to the start of the packet
+			 * data.
+			 */
+			if (first_seg == NULL)
+				data_len -= IGC_TS_HDR_LEN;
+			else
+				rxm->data_off -= IGC_TS_HDR_LEN;
+		}
 		rxm->data_len = data_len;
 
 		/*
@@ -557,6 +582,7 @@ igc_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 				last_seg->data_len = last_seg->data_len -
 					 (RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN - data_len);
 				last_seg->next = NULL;
+				rxm = last_seg;
 			} else {
 				rxm->data_len = (uint16_t)
 					(data_len - RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN);
-- 
2.47.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-01 13:57 Martin Weiser [this message]
2024-11-01 14:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-11-01 14:43   ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00f78eba-8eff-4c67-8ecf-3bef5f25b9f6@allegro-packets.com \
    --to=martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).