From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] allow procinfo and pdump on eth vdev
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153196A3A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522950303-17206-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jianfeng Tan
> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 1:45 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] allow procinfo and pdump on eth vdev
>
> v2:
> - Add spinlock for vdev device list as suggested by Anatoly.
> - Add ring, cxgbe and remove the free in each PMDs as suggested by
> Matan.
> - Rebase on master.
>
> As we know, we have below limitations in vdev:
> - dpdk-procinfo cannot get the stats of (most) vdev in primary process;
> - dpdk-pdump cannot dump the packets for (most) vdev in primary proces;
> - secondary process cannot use (most) vdev in primary process.
>
> The very first reason is that the secondary process actually does not know the
> existence of those vdevs as vdevs are chained on a linked list, and not
> shareable to secondary.
>
> In this patch series, we would like to propose a vdev sharing model like this:
> - As a secondary process boots, all devices (including vdev) in primary
> will be automatically shared. After both primary and secondary process
> booted,
> - Device add/remove in primary will be translated to device hog
> plug/unplug
> event in secondary processes. (TODO)
> - Device add in secondary
> * If that kind of device support multi-process, the secondary will
> request the primary to probe the device and the primary to share
> it to the secondary. It's not necessary to have secondary-private
> device in this case. (TODO)
> * If that kind of device does not support multi-process, the secondary
> will probe the device by itself, and the port id is shared among
> all primary/secondary processes.
>
> This patch series don't:
> - provide secondary data path (Rx/Tx) support for each specific vdev.
>
> How to test:
>
> Step 0: start testpmd with a vhost port; and a VM connected to the vhost
> port.
>
> Step 1: try using dpdk-procinfo to get the stats.
> $(dpdk-procinfo) --log-level=8 --no-pci -- --stats
>
> Step 2: try using dpdk-pdump to dump the packets.
> $(dpdk-pdump) -- --pdump 'port=0,queue=*,rx-dev=/tmp/rx.pcap'
>
> Jianfeng Tan (5):
> eal: bring forward multi-process channel init
> bus/vdev: add lock on vdev device list
> bus/vdev: bus scan by multi-process channel
> drivers/net: not use private eth dev data
> drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process
>
> drivers/bus/vdev/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 187
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c | 43 +++----
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 13 +++
> drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c | 1 -
> drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c | 14 +++
> drivers/net/kni/rte_eth_kni.c | 26 +++--
> drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 32 ++---
> drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 29 ++---
> drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c | 32 ++---
> drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c | 17 +--
> drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic.c | 19 ++-
> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 24 ++--
> drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 36 +++---
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 23 ++--
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 23 ++--
> 16 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
Reviewed-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Also tested with af_packet and dpdk-procinfo / dpdk-dump, patches works as expected.
Regards
Qi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 17:44 Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-05 17:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] eal: bring forward multi-process channel init Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-05 17:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] bus/vdev: add lock on vdev device list Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-05 17:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] bus/vdev: bus scan by multi-process channel Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-05 17:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] drivers/net: not use private eth dev data Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-05 17:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-12 23:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] allow procinfo and pdump on eth vdev Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-13 14:39 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-17 2:24 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153196A3A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).